Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!

Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review

Postby Apoptosis » Wed May 30, 2007 10:09 am

The Adaptec RAID 3805 is an 8-port controller that supports SATA and SAS drives and next-generation PCIe connectivity. It features Adaptec RAID Code (ARC) with RAID levels 0, 1, 1E, 5, 5EE, 6, 10, 50, 60, JBOD and more! Read on to see how this MD2 low-profile RAID card does as we test it with 8 Western Digital Raptor hard drives in 11 RAID configurations on Linux!

Image

Raid10 can be a good compromise between raid5 and raid0 in terms of size. This configuration also allows you to have 1 and sometimes two drives fail and still maintain your volume. If you are like me and use your PC as a DVR, I have no real need for the extra speed. Raid5 is my choice because it gives me the most hard drive space while giving me at least one drive failure. If a drive does fail getting a next day air replacement from newegg will suffice. The odds that another drive will fail in those 24 hours are extremely low. If I want to be even more cautious, I can keep a hot spare in the array that could be merged into the array automatically.


Article Title: Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/508/1/
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 33648
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Postby bubba » Wed May 30, 2007 1:50 pm

Nice read. I'd think you would have to be real serious about data storage to have one of these in your home setup. Deep pockets wouldn't hurt either :mrgreen:

If there was a part two to this review, I would likely include tests of 7200rpm SATA drives which are bigger and cheaper.


Bet you could build one nice setup with 7200rpm SATA drives, but would it be worth it?
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
-Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Postby Sovereign » Wed May 30, 2007 5:10 pm

Cool. Now, if only I had a PCI-E ribbon extender... What I mean is something that extends the PCI-E slot out and is flexible. That's the only way to get any more expansion cards in my case due to dual 7900GTXs and an X-Fi consuming all available space.
Play
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz :: 8GB DDR2-800 :: eVGA 9800GX2 :: 7900GTX (secondary) :: abit IP35 Pro :: 150GB Raptor 10k RPM :: 2x750GB WD Caviar :: 120GB WD :: X-Fi XtremeMusic :: NEC 4551A :: BenQ DVD Combodrive (52x32x52) :: Dual 22" Acer AL2216W :: Thermaltake Armor Black :: Logitech Z5500 5.1

Work
Core 2 Duo @ 2.53GHz :: 4GB DDR3 @ 1067MHz :: 3670 :: Intel PM45 Chipset :: 500GB 5400RPM SATA :: Integrated Audio :: BD-ROM/DVD Burner :: 16" 1920x1080 RGBLED
Sovereign
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
 
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 5:28 pm

Postby atlr » Thu May 31, 2007 3:38 am

suggestion: add single drive to all tests for a performanance comparison with RAID
atlr
Legit User
Legit User
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm

Postby DX » Thu May 31, 2007 8:42 am

Damn nice review. I'm glad to see some thing like this.
User avatar
DX
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:40 pm

please compare with software raid

Postby dlang » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:26 am

in a configuration test like this, especially when running Linux, it would be good to have a few datapoints in the results showing how this card compares with the software option (you may also need to note the CPU utilization during the tests)

after all, is $500 really buying anything?

just one test with each raid type would be enough
dlang
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:22 am


Return to Legit Reviews Review Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests