NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33432
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card Review

Postby Apoptosis » Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:34 am

NVIDIA today announced the new GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GTX 750 video cards, which are very interesting to use as they are the first cards based on NVIDIA's new Maxwell graphics architecture. NVIDIA has been developing Maxwell for a number of years and have decided to launch entry-level discrete graphics cards with the new technology first in the $119 to $149 price range. NVIDIA heavily focused on performance per watt with Maxwell and it clearly shows as the GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB video card measures just 5.7-inches in length with a tiny heatsink and doesn't require any internal power connectors!


Image


Article Title: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/nvidia-gefo ... iew_135752
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!

JD Tech
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:07 pm

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card Review

Postby JD Tech » Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:13 pm

Doesn't the ASUS' Quad monitor support mean anything or not significant enough to consider? I would choose the MSI without batting an eye but why can't it have quad monitor support as well?

Here's the scenario:

Hey guys! I am purchasing a new graphics card and I am deciding between two GTX 750 TIs from different manufacturers, both coming to $89.99 after rebate. First is the MSI, boasting a slightly higher clock speed and military grade capacitors and Direct X 12 but only supports up to 3 monitors. Second is the ASUS' GTX 750 TI which is also very nice looking but can support up to 4 monitors. so my questions are 1.Which is the better card 2.Which is the better value 3.Does the slightly faster clock speed, military grade capacitors, and coming with DirectX 12 pre-integrated outweigh the ASUS' Quad monitor capability? Ive also read this:

The MSI has the fastest clock out-of-the-box and should have a small edge on the Asus. But the Asus requires a 6 pin PCIe power connector and the MSI does not. So if you are into OC'ing your cards, the Asus may be able to OC higher w/o exceeding the 75W power limit of the PCIe x16 slot.

I will prob not be OC'ing, but would like to choose the one that is of better quality will last longer/stay cooler, and has the better/nicer features. Seems the MSI does have some nice features but that quad monitor possibility from the ASUS is definitely something to consider and is what makes me second guess the MSI.

MSI> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... =N82E168...

ASUS> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... =N82E168...

User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3369
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card Review

Postby KnightRid » Sat Nov 28, 2015 4:40 am

If you are running quad monitors on a sub $100 video card then I am impressed, if it is for gaming. Regular every day use would be decent but I would go for something a little higher end to make sure to be able to push the graphic data out evenly across all four without losing quality.

Personally, I have always been impressed with EVGA cards...all a matter of personal preference and what you think will do a better job for what you need it to. If you HAVE to have 4 monitor support then the choice is easy. If you dont have to use 4 monitors then I would jump on the MSI.
Cigar Blog I review for - http://www.stogiereview.com


Return to “Legit Reviews Review Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests