64 3200 Venice OC

Discussions about AMD Processors and overclocking. Need help with that new AMD CPU or not sure which one to buy? Like to void your warranty? This is the place for you! Please keep the topic on Processors only!

64 3200 Venice OC

Postby Merlin » Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:17 am

I have a new 3200 Venice and I was wondering what I can OC it to with a factory Heatsink/fan. My MOBO is a Lanparty ultra-d my ram is PC3200 so I know that limits me some, recommendations pleaase.
Merlin
ASUS M5A88-M | Phenom II X4 955 BE| 8Gb G-Skill Ripjaws DDR3 2133| EVGA GTX460 SSC| Corsair HX520W PSU
User avatar
Merlin
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 4:03 pm
Location: Dallas Texas

Re: 64 3200 Venice OC

Postby Apoptosis » Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:15 am

Merlin wrote:I have a new 3200 Venice and I was wondering what I can OC it to with a factory Heatsink/fan. My MOBO is a Lanparty ultra-d my ram is PC3200 so I know that limits me some, recommendations pleaase.


Not sure, but that's the fun of overclocking... go for as much as you can and see what happens!
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 33828
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Postby FZ1 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:57 am

That mobo comes with a utility that monitors temps - smartguardian. Make sure you set your bios to shut off or alarm when your CPU temp reaches a certain level as a safety net. Believe it or not, I think this is off by default.
Joe
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4659
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby HONkUS » Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:33 am

I used to have a 3200+ but I cant remember if it was a Newcastle or Venice all I remember was that one was a good overclocker and one was a terrible overclocker and that I had the terrible one.
User avatar
HONkUS
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas!

Postby FZ1 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:08 pm

Venice is usu better because of the 65nm architecture.
Joe
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4659
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Apoptosis » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:26 pm

FZ1 wrote:Venice is usu better because of the 65nm architecture.


"Venice" was 90nm and replaced the "Newcastle", which was 130nm. It was a far better overclocker than many of the older 130nm parts that it replaced ;)
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 33828
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Postby FZ1 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:51 pm

Yes, that's what I meant...I just got done reading an article about 65nm so I had it on the brain ](*,) My premise was still right though :)
Joe
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4659
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby HONkUS » Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:20 pm

yeah my trusty socket 754 3200+ Newcastle was awesome back in the day..... wait no it wasn't lol
User avatar
HONkUS
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas!


Return to AMD Processor Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests