NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphics card was designed for gamers who want to enjoy their games at the maximum graphics settings and screen resolutions, with high levels of AA enabled. To accomplish this, the GeForce GTX 680 ships with 1536 CUDA Cores that have base clock speed of 1006MHz and typical Boost clock speed is 1058MHz. The GeForce GTX 680 also comes with 2GB of GDDR5 memory that are clocked at 6008MHz! Read on to see if this is enough to beat the AMD Radeon HD 7970!

Image
In the seven game titles that we tested today, we found the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 to be 14.34% faster than the stock AMD Radeon HD 7970 reference card when we compared all of the tests results at a resolution of 1920x1080. Factor in that the GeForce GTX 680 costs $50 or 9% less and you got yourself some pretty good reasons to go with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 over an AMD Radeon HD 7900 series card.
Article Title: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1881/1/
MSRP: $499
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Major_A »

Seems like should have at least gone with a 384 bit memory controller. It's a nice card but seems like a crippled card that could've been better.
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

Major_A wrote:Seems like should have at least gone with a 384 bit memory controller. It's a nice card but seems like a crippled card that could've been better.
Likely, but it's still ~14% faster across the board than a Radeon HD 7970 reference card with the 256-bit controller design with the super fast 6GHz+ memory chips.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
jnanster
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:09 am
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by jnanster »

Thank you for the great review!
Well I wouldn't call it crippled, but the memory controller IMO is an issue.
Nice cool card.
What most impressed me was the video/TXAA/and the new more destructible Physx.
Combined, these make for more playable and realistic gaming, boom factor.
Jnanster
ga-z77-dh3 (great & cheap O/C'er from Gigabyte)
i2600k/16 gigs Kingson 1600 (OC'ed to 4.5Ghz)
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 + (lapped, smok'in deal, 38C idle, 65C loaded)
MSI GTX 660ti Power Edition
Antec 900 case (quiet)
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Major_A »

Apoptosis wrote:
Major_A wrote:Seems like should have at least gone with a 384 bit memory controller. It's a nice card but seems like a crippled card that could've been better.
Likely, but it's still ~14% faster across the board than a Radeon HD 7970 reference card with the 256-bit controller design with the super fast 6GHz+ memory chips.
I have a feeling they probably did it on purpose so down the road they can "tweak" the card and sell it as a new SKU. After playing around internally with the card against an HD 7970 they probably came to just that conclusion.
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

Well all know that NVIDIA does an amazing job with products and marketing, so I think you are on the right path. GK110 in August/September will be interesting to say the least.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Sttm
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:31 pm
Location: San Jose CA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Sttm »

The 680 looks like a real winner, but I have a suspicion they were developing this to be the mid range 560ti replacement but then hit such high performance they decided to make it the the 580 replacement instead. As you'd think the GK110 would be the 580 successor and not the 104. Which makes me wonder if in the fall they release GK110 as a 695? Or do they make it a 700 series product. But with the die size increase and the memory controller improvements, it should be about as big of a difference as the 580 is over the 560ti now. Which is quite large.

Either way its dam good news. Performance/Price finally getting the proper increase with the 28nm generation.
Core i7 2600k/ ASUS P8Z68-V Z68/ 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 Blue/ EVGA Geforce GTX 560ti Maximum Graphics Edition/Windows 7/Antec 300/Antec 650w/LG Blu Combo/Hp 27inch 2710M/Samsung P2770HD

"I think sharing is overrated...and helping others. And what's all this crap I've been hearing about tolerance?"
CoachAub
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:15 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by CoachAub »

Great news and thanks for sharing this through a very thorough review!!! I'm glad to see competition heating up again, but the way NVidia was bragging they would crush AMD's 7970....I expected a bigger jump in benchmarks. It's still impressive, don't get me wrong. Some folks will say it does dominate AMD's cards it, but almost no one said the 7970 crushed or dominated the 580. It was just merely better as I think we see here. We're seeing the next step-up in level of performance for sure. Now, we'll see if AMD can come up with their next device (besides the usual dual-chip monsters that come out for each flagship card from both sides).
_______________________________________________________
Rig#1: Intel i5-3570K, MSI-B75MA-P45 mobo, G-Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1600 2x4gb, MSI-7870 2gd5t/oc gpu, Tt TR2-600w psu, Tt Commander Snow ed. Case, Cooler Master Hyper212+ HSF, OCZ Agility3 SSD 120GB, WE Caviar Black 750GB
Rig#2: AMD Phenom 2-970, MSI-890FXA-GD-65 mobo, 6GB Geil DDR3-1333, HIS Radeon HD6870 1GB gpu, Antec Quattro-850 psu, Rosewill Conqueror Case, Zalman CNPS-9500 hsf, 1TB Toshiba Sata3 HD
User avatar
Ramon Zarat
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:57 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Review

Post by Ramon Zarat »

"NVidia was bragging they would crush AMD's 7970....I expected a bigger jump in benchmarks"

It only took Nvidia its mainstream GPU (GK104) to exceed the top of the line ATI 7970 on all front: price, power and performance. From that perspective, it *IS* an epic crush. Just imagine what the real monster, the GK110, will do. For all intent and suppose, the GK104 is a neutered version of the GK110. I suspect that one will have a 384bit bus, coupled with GDDR5 6GHZ+, much better GPGPU performance, especially in the FP64 department and of course, much more overall raw power. Time will tell. I still hate Nvidia as a corporation, but I would be a fool not to recognized what they have just accomplished.
Post Reply