Page 1 of 1

EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router Revie

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:18 am
by Apoptosis
The Engenius XtraRange ESR750H is a Dual-Band Concurrent (300 + 450 Mbps) Wireless-N Router with a built-in 4-Port Gigabit switch and a Gigabit WAN port, and a built-in USB port to support a USB hard drive, USB printer or USB-enabled speaker for streaming music from an iTunes-enabled device. Read on to see how this sub $100 Wireless-N router performs when we put it to the test!

Image
After using the EnGenius ESR750H router for a few weeks, I really fell in love with some aspects of this sub-$100 router – namely, the size, power consumption and user interface. Because the ESR750H is outfitted with 2 external 5 dBi antennas, we really expected the router to have a larger range of service than that of the other routers we have in our arsenal with internal antennas.
Article Title: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/2031/1/
Pricing At Time of Print: $99.99 Shipped

Re: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router R

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:44 pm
by pwcmed
I love that you guys do these types of reviews.

Re: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router R

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:06 pm
by Digital Puppy
pwcmed wrote:I love that you guys do these types of reviews.
Thanks, man! Sorry it wasn't a better performer!

Re: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router R

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:13 am
by Apoptosis
Don't apologize for that! It's our job to show the differences, so people know what models to buy. Without in-depth reviews like the ones you do for LR people wouldn't not know!

Re: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router R

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:27 am
by kenc51
pwcmed wrote:I love that you guys do these types of reviews.
I second that

Thanks Ken

Re: EnGenius XtraRange ESR750H Dual-Band Wireless-N Router R

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:24 pm
by Digital Puppy
Apoptosis wrote:Don't apologize for that! It's our job to show the differences, so people know what models to buy. Without in-depth reviews like the ones you do for LR people wouldn't not know!
No, no...I just meant that I really wished it was a better performer since it looked so good on paper. I think people will read the specs and see the price and go, "nice!" (I did). But the thing really was disappointing. You can really see how not all devices are built the same.

...so, I guess I'm agreeing with you!! :D