Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review

Post by Apoptosis »

Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review


Image

Article Title: Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/intel-core- ... iew_143880
Pricing At Time of Print: $339.99 Shipped
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
sbohdan
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review

Post by sbohdan »

Nice review! The only thing that I miss, is to compare Sandy and Ivy Bridge processors performance @ 4.4Ghz and 4.7Ghz, to see if Haswell is really better, or just a simple OC that could be done on the former as well? I would also like to see temp. comparisons @ these sppeeds, to see how the new TIM compares to the solder used on Sandy Bridge? All that said, I will wait for the new Broadwell hoping for REAL improvement, not just little optimizations. As far as I see, Intel did a real screw-up, when they changed from the solder to some cheap TIM and Devil's Canyon is just a minor fix of that screw-up + a little OC.
Main rig: NZXT Phantom modded case with Danger Den WC, Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite, Ryzen 5800X @ stock, 32GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200Mhz 16-18-18-36-1T, AMD RX 5700XT + AlphaCool WC, ACER Nitro XV2 27", SP 1TB nvme PCiE GEN3, Samsung 2TB; Cooler Master MW Gold 650W, Win10 Pro 64
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Intel Core i7-4790K Devil's Canyon Processor Review

Post by Apoptosis »

Thanks for the feedback, but I not sure why you want to see Sandy and Ivy Bridge performance at 4.4Ghz and 4.7Ghz... The review included the 2700K, 3770K and 4770K, which are processors with 3.5GHz base clock speeds and have Turbo clocks of 3.9GHz. So, you have Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge and Haswell all at identical clock speeds in the same review, so you should be able to get a ton of info from that. Raising the clocks and re-doing all the testing at higher clock speeds would increase the scores, but all should scale equally.

The reason I didn't include temperatures on Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge is because it was on a totally different platform and I hate to compare temps from a Gigabyte board to an ASUS board and if I recall the algorithm used to calculate temps might be slightly different on Sandy than Haswell.

I too am waiting for Broadwell as that is a new architecture... Not just an updated package with a TIM change.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Post Reply