Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Hard Drives, Optical Drives, USB keys, Flash memory. Need help with or have experiences with a storage device? Share it in here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Apoptosis »

Just got the Intel 160GB 34nm SSDSA1MH160G2 drive in this morning:
intel_ssdsa2mh160g2c1.jpg
intel_ssdsa2mh160g2c1.jpg (36.18 KiB) Viewed 5207 times
intel_34nmssd_box.jpg
intel_34nmssd_box.jpg (38.67 KiB) Viewed 5207 times
intel_160gb_ssd.jpg
intel_160gb_ssd.jpg (41.06 KiB) Viewed 5207 times
intel_sata_header.jpg
intel_sata_header.jpg (18.95 KiB) Viewed 5207 times
Features:
The Intel X25-M on 34nm flash is drop-in compatible to the current 50nm version and traditional hard disk drives (HDDs). Higher in performance and durability than an HDD, the lightweight and low power Intel X25-M can also help extend notebook battery life. Featuring the latest-generation native SATA interface with an advanced architecture employing 10 parallel NAND Flash channels, the Intel SSD is architected with powerful Native Command Queuing to enable up to 32 concurrent operations. Other features include low write amplification and a unique wear-leveling design for higher reliability and longer lasting performance.

What’s different from the previous X25-M on 50nm and HDDs?
Compared to its previous 50nm version, the new Intel X25-M on 34nm offers decreased latency and faster random write Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) than its 50nm predecessor. Specifically, Intel’s new SSD provides a 25 percent further reduction in latency, for quicker access to data, operating at 65-microsecond read latency compared to approximately 4,000 microseconds for an HDD. Random write performance has increased 2x for the 80GB and 2.5x for the 160GB to further separate the X25-M from other SSDs. By delivering up to 6,600 4KB write IOPS (8,600 IOPS for the 160GB) and up to 35,000 read IOPS, the X25-M continues to set the bar for SSDs, while leapfrogging HDDs which only operate at several hundred IOPS for traditional HDDs. This provides for markedly faster system and application responsiveness. Overall, gamers, media creators and technology enthusiasts should experience faster PC responsiveness. The Intel X25-M on 34nm therefore widens the performance gap even further over HDDs on all fronts, including latency, sustained reads and writes and random read and writes.

The other difference that you might see is a new look. Intel continues to bring costs down, all the way down to the paint. So you will first notice that these SSDs are now silver.

Pricing:
On 34nm process lithography, Intel is passing on cost reductions to its customers. As of July 21, 2009, the channel price quoted for the X-25M 80GB is $225 (down from $595 at introduction one year ago) and the 160GB version is $440 (down from $945) for quantities up to 1,000 units. For the latest street pricing though, we suggest you check e-tailers, such as newegg.com, at time of your review.

Intel Mainstream Solid-State Drives on 34nm is currently shipping in the 2.5-inch standard form factor (Intel® X25-M Mainstream SATA Solid-State Drive), and will be shipping the 1.8-inch (Intel® X18-M Mainstream SATA Solid-State Drive) later in the quarter. Both have the same performance specifications.
specs.jpg
specs.jpg (175.96 KiB) Viewed 5204 times
More to come in a little bit!
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Apoptosis »

First 34nm SSD Benchmark:
intel_34nm_hdtach.jpg
intel_34nm_hdtach.jpg (59.26 KiB) Viewed 5201 times
intel_34nm_hdtune.jpg
intel_34nm_hdtune.jpg (65.09 KiB) Viewed 5144 times
intel_34nm_hdtune2.jpg
intel_34nm_hdtune2.jpg (76.43 KiB) Viewed 5144 times
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Illuminati
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2378
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:48 am
Location: Wright City, Missouri, USA
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Illuminati »

Will these support the Windows 7 TRIM command?
Justin West
Server Admin & Forum Moderator
Follow me on Twitter | Find us on Facebook
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Apoptosis »

Illuminati wrote:Will these support the Windows 7 TRIM command?
Yes with a firmware update in Q4 2009, but the old 50nm drives won't no matter what... I'll have more on this in my article later today.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by FZ1 »

<--- can't wait to see the article.
Joe
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Apoptosis »

FZ1 wrote:<--- can't wait to see the article.
It's coming... I stayed up late to benchmark the OCZ Agility and Summit as well, so this should be a pretty good read...

SSDs Included in the Testing
Kingston V series
Kingston M series (Gen 1 Intel 50nm drive)
Super Talent MasterDrive
Super Talent UltraDrive
Corsair P256
OCZ Vertex
OCZ Vertex EX
OCZ Agility
OCZ Summit
Intel X25-M 160gb Gen 2 34nm drive
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Major_A »

If this new manufacturing FAB does what Intel says it will, then great. Otherwise I'll wait on the drives become more mature. It's too much of a PITA to install an OS drive and every other standard application, game, etc... on a different drive/RAID array.
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Intel 34nm 160GB SSD First Pictures and Benchmarks

Post by Apoptosis »

Our full review has been posted here - http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1022/1/
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Post Reply