Leaked screenshot of HD 6870?

Forum for all the AMD (Previously ATI) video cards from the past, present and future!
Post Reply
User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Leaked screenshot of HD 6870?

Post by skier »

6870Be.jpg
A forum member on Chinese website has leaked a 3D Mark Vantage Extreme benchmark, alongwith a GPU-Z screenshot, alleged to be from a next-gen ATI Radeon HD 6870. The important result is the 3D Mark Vantage score, which X11963. Considering the GTX 480 offers under X10000, and the HD 5870 is in the X9000 range, this is an impressive result for what is rumoured to be a minor intermediate generation on the same 40nm process.

It is the GPU-Z screenshot, however, which reveals more details. GPU-Z recognizes the sample as an "ATI Radeon HD 6800 Series". The GPU ID is 6718, which according to the Catalyst 10.8 codename list, indicates a Cayman XT GPU - well in line with rumours thus far. The core clock is same as the HD 5870 - 850 MHz. This suggests the performance boost comes from more functional units (perhaps 1920 SP) or improved performance per clock (using some of Northern Islands' units) or a combination of both. The GDDR5 speed is boosted by a whopping 33% to 1.6 GHz, or a whopping 6.4 GHz effective. The same 256-bit memory interface is retained, but the ultra fast memory results in a massive memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s - well over the GTX 480's 177.4 GB/s. Of course, one of the possibilities for such a high memory clock speed, as well as the impressive benchmark, could be that the card is benchmarked overclocked.

Of course, many such leaks are at times proved to be fake / photoshopped, so take these leaks for what they are. That said, if they are faked, they are indeed very good fakes, as most of the details make sense.
Source (well not really the source, but their source link doesn't work)
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
User avatar
lordvic
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:00 am
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada

Re: Leaked screenshot of HD 6870?

Post by lordvic »

Hmm...quite interesting indeed. :-k
Why is ATi still keeping the 256-bit memory interface? - other then keeping prices down - it would definitely provide a very noticeable boost in performance with 384-bit.
Feels like they will hit a wall in the near future when more Stream Processors won't give much of a performance boost...considering GDDR5, 256-bit memory interface, and same Core/mem clocks is still used.
Cooler Master HAF 932 // Phenom II 1090T @ 4.1GHz (not 110% stable) // ASUS Crosshair V Formula 990FX // Thermaltake Frio CPU Cooler // Sapphire Dual-X HD 7970 @ 1150/1500 // 8GB (2X4GB) G.Skill RipJaws + 8GB (2X4GB) G.Skill RipJawsX @1600 8-9-8-21-1T // Corsair TX850 // Corsair ForceGT 120GB SSD // Kingston V200+ 120GB SSD // WD Caviar Black 1TB // LiteON DVD-RW // Windows 7 Ult. 64-bit
Post Reply