Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by Apoptosis »

Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Inspired by the Corsair Performance Analysis of 4GB versus 2GB of memory we figured it would be fun to see for ourselves how gaming performance is impacted by adding more system memory. We got our hands on a 2GB and a 4GB set of Corsiar DOMINATOR PC2-9136C5 memory modules and set off to see what happens to the average framerate in nine games at 1920x1200.

Image

Article Title: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit
Article URL: http://legitreviews.com/article/709/1/
User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by skier »

kinda wish framerates were'nt as negligable, but it goes to show, RAM isnt a factor in-game, but is a factor getting you into it 8)

nice little test :)
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by Apoptosis »

you hit the nail on the head. It also helps the low frame rate averages on some games, but 2-3FPS at the low isn't going to really make a night or day difference in gaming. Our test platform was pretty stout too though.
User avatar
stereo55
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Menifee , Calif

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by stereo55 »

Nice article . :mrgreen:

Personally I would not tough Vista x64 with less then 4gigs myself , as Vista uses about 1gig just to run (non-tweaked) , leaving only a gig left and with some newer games using up to that remaining gig ; leaving you to use the page file .

Next time I boot to my Vista side , I'll run a mem usage check on Bioshock and a few other games and see what I come up with . (btw , my Vista side is not toned down or tweeked , aka:vLite so results should be fairly accurate) .
* i7 5930K @ 4GHz 1.085v - Corsair H100i GTX - Asrock x99 OC Formula 3.1
* Sandisk Extreme Pro 480gb - HGST NAS 3TB - 2x WD Blue 1TB - 32gig Crucial 2133 - EVGA 980 Ti Classified - Corsair 780T/Seasonic 760 Platinum
* LG 34" Ultra Wide - Hanns-G HZ281HPB 27.5" - LG WH16NS40 Blu Burner - SoundBlaster Z - Klipsch 4.1's/Altec center channel
* Windows 8.1 Pro/Windows 10
* Retired game rig i7 920 @ 3.9 - EVGA x58 - still going strong!

Heatware
User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by skier »

stereo55 wrote:Nice article . :mrgreen:

Personally I would not tough Vista x64 with less then 4gigs myself , as Vista uses about 1gig just to run (non-tweaked) , leaving only a gig left and with some newer games using up to that remaining gig ; leaving you to use the page file.
Windows Xp home: currently using 600MB by itself, with 512MB of RAM in the PC, and THEN gaming; Entirely pagefile ](*,)
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
User avatar
Wildfire788
Legit Enthusiast
Legit Enthusiast
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:41 pm

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by Wildfire788 »

stereo55 wrote:Personally I would not tough Vista x64 with less then 4gigs myself , as Vista uses about 1gig just to run (non-tweaked) , leaving only a gig left and with some newer games using up to that remaining gig ; leaving you to use the page file.
Actually, unused RAM is wasted RAM. Your OS is loading commonly used programs into memory so they can launch faster. Vista can easily free that up for games if needed, so I would say 2gb is fine.

Why spend $120 on another 2gb of RAM to get +2 frames per second when you can spend that much extra on your video card and get +20 frames?
User avatar
vicaphit
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2789
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: SE Ohio

Re: Game Testing 2GB versus 4GB of Memory on Vista 64-bit

Post by vicaphit »

Vista is using 1 gig?? I have 2 gigs, and with everything running I only use about 30-40% of my ram.

That includes rivatuner, ultramon, razer tray processes...etc
----
Andy

New Rig: Intel Q6600 (2.7ghz), ASUS P5KC, 4GB DDR2-800, Palit 9600GT (1GB), Ultra X3 1KW (thanks LR!), Vista 64bit
Dell Rig: AMD Athlon X2 4000+ (2.1ghz), 2 GB DDR2 Ram, MSI 8800GT (512MB), Vista 32bit

PSN: VICaphit
Post Reply