24 ATI Radeon PCI-E Video Cards Benchmarked

Post by **Apoptosis** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:05 am

Not many publications have the ability to show performance of a dozen video cards over several generations of GPU's, but that is exactly what Legit Reviews has been able to do. We've taken a handful of our 'retired' graphics cards out of the closet to get some updated benchmarking numbers. Armed with the above 24 ATI graphics cards we bring you some benchmark numbers that show how they all stack up!

Article Title: 24 ATI Radeon PCI-E Video Cards Benchmarked
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/474/1/

Post by **dicecca112** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:22 am

Digg Link

http://digg.com/hardware/24_ATI_Radeon_ ... enchmarked

Please Digg, it helps get LR Traffic, which in turn keeps us in business which in turn keeps getting you guys great contests.

Great Review BTW Brian. Something to have stickied and refer many people too. Definetly something to update too.

Mad_Goku · Post by **Mad_Goku** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:22 am

nice review Brian!

x300 FTW!!!!!

Post by **Illuminati** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:23 am

Great job, Brian! I know many hours went into benchmarking for this article. I think its great to be able to see the whole spectrum of cards and how they really stack up against one another.

I dugg it!

Post by **Apoptosis** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:24 am

dugg and I would like to thank Brain for all his time and hard work on getting these numbers... I know a few late nights and a ton of Miller Lite were consumed getthing these numbers.

DaIceMan · Post by **DaIceMan** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:49 am

Awesome Job Brian!! I need to pick up one of those X300 cards. ;)

ibleet · Post by **ibleet** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:38 am

Dugg! Incredible job Brian!

dgood · Post by **dgood** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:57 am

i've been looking for a good priced upgrade for my x800xt ever since rainbow six vegas game out since I cannot play it on my x800xt. Though in all my other games it gets better frames than my x1600xt. You want to part with an x1800xt for cheap I might be interested

. nice review, definatly a lot of time put into it. Does this mean we'll see a nvidia version of this too? and maybe some charts to compare the two? Well done guys, keep em coming.

Post by **Apoptosis** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:03 pm

Yes, We have all the GeForce 8 series cards already benchmarked and are currently working on including the GeForce 7 and 6 series right now. We will publish an NVIDIA version of this and then we will do an article with all of them in there... It will be nearly 60 graphics cards all said and done.

dgood · Post by **dgood** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:04 pm

awesome

BiGg RiE · Post by **BiGg RiE** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:13 pm

Apoptosis wrote:Yes, We have all the GeForce 8 series cards already benchmarked and are currently working on including the GeForce 7 and 6 series right now. We will publish an NVIDIA version of this and then we will do an article with all of them in there... It will be nearly 60 graphics cards all said and done.

Sounds really good I'm looking forward to it

Post by **dicecca112** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:31 pm

Great for those people that say I play x game what performance can I expect. My budget is x. You can link them to this. Great Ideas Brian and Nate

kenc51 · Post by **kenc51** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:48 pm

Great job Brian!

Bwall · Post by **Bwall** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:47 am

Thanks all! It's a lot of work but if it can help people out then it's worth it.

By the way, this is just a small sampling of the testing done. As Nate mention above there will be two more articles once I've completed testing on all of the NVIDIA cards, the final of which will be very large but have an incredible amount of information.

-Brian

Jejking · Post by **Jejking** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:11 am

Nice review again, although the Crossfire-fixed-part was a really big surprise for me. Nice to see there is a good solution, although maybe ATi didn't mean to but did it by accident

prozac26 · Post by **prozac26** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:02 am

Nice review/article.

But why no X1900GT?

Post by **Apoptosis** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:53 am

prozac26 wrote:Nice review/article.

But why no X1900GT?

Never got one to be honest... LOL

dgood · Post by **dgood** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:10 am

btw were there any tests done at resolutions higher than 1280x1024? I ask this because besides people with small lcd's most people game higher resolution than that such as 1600x1200, 1680x1050, and even higher if you rock the 30+ lcd or the nice crt'.

Post by **Apoptosis** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:38 am

as brian mentioned we did a variety of resolutions, which will be seen in future articles... We bought the 30" for a reason ;)

prozac26 · Post by **prozac26** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:22 pm

Apoptosis wrote:
prozac26 wrote:Nice review/article.

But why no X1900GT?
Never got one to be honest... LOL

My X1900GT is sad now, it'll start lagging up on me.