Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

This is the place to discuss the latest computer hardware issues and technology. Please keep the discussion ON TOPIC!
Post Reply
User avatar
Aratae
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:40 pm
Location: Tooele, UT

Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Aratae »

When I ran SpeedTest I got these results:

1339 kbps download

728 kbs upload

My internet provider is Qwest.

I'm new to this, so I don't know if the results are good or bad, any thoughts?

Thx
eMachines T5010 desktop, modified with Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard, AMD Athlon 64x2 4400+ dual core processors @ 2.3GHZ, 3GB Samsung DDR2-SDRAM PC-6400 (399Mhz)-[DDR2-800], 420 Watt PSU, Windows XP Home Edition and XFX GeForce 8600GT XXX (1/17/08).
User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4295
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by KnightRid »

What speed plan do you have?

Were you doing anything else on the computer while testing?

1.3mb of speed isnt even offered here with verizon. I have 3/768 through them and my speeds are always around 299X downloading.

It all goes by what plan you have.

Mike
Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me :finga:
User avatar
Aratae
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:40 pm
Location: Tooele, UT

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Aratae »

I just have the basic Qwest internet service, I wasn't doing anything else. I didn't understand your answer tho, is 1339kbps very slow? Yours 299X? can you tell me what 299X means?
eMachines T5010 desktop, modified with Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard, AMD Athlon 64x2 4400+ dual core processors @ 2.3GHZ, 3GB Samsung DDR2-SDRAM PC-6400 (399Mhz)-[DDR2-800], 420 Watt PSU, Windows XP Home Edition and XFX GeForce 8600GT XXX (1/17/08).
User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4295
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by KnightRid »

slow and fast are relative.

I have a 3mbps connection which to me is fast.

You have a 1.3mbps connection.

Looks like you have the Qwest FASTER plan which is speeds UP TO 1.5mbps download.

I would say your connection is doing well!!!

Fast for me could be slow for you - my one friend has a 6mbps cable modem and thinks it is slow.

Mike
Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me :finga:
User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by kenc51 »

Aratae wrote:I just have the basic Qwest internet service, I wasn't doing anything else. I didn't understand your answer tho, is 1339kbps very slow? Yours 299X? can you tell me what 299X means?
I think you have their mid range package, which is 1.5Mbit speeds. If so you're actual download speed is about right. The max you'd get would be ~1500kbps.
The cheapest package they have is only 256k DSL which is very slow, if you're paying for that and getting 1339kbps, then it's great!

Cable DSL providers tend not to lock your speed, but instead they have a higher "contention ratio"
Contention ratio is how many people you share the "back haul" link with from your area to the ISP.
Most do 48:1 which means you share the link with 48 others, this also means during peak times the speeds can go down due to congestion, and during off-peak times there's less congestion so you get more speeds.

Unless you do a lot of downloading, those speeds are perfectly fine!
User avatar
Aratae
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:40 pm
Location: Tooele, UT

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Aratae »

Thanks so much for your replies, I feel alot better now. I think I have the package just below their fastest service but don't remember what its called. Anyhow, everything (games etc) seemed to work fine with it, just wanted to check with folks that know about such things :)
eMachines T5010 desktop, modified with Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard, AMD Athlon 64x2 4400+ dual core processors @ 2.3GHZ, 3GB Samsung DDR2-SDRAM PC-6400 (399Mhz)-[DDR2-800], 420 Watt PSU, Windows XP Home Edition and XFX GeForce 8600GT XXX (1/17/08).
User avatar
martini161
Mr Awesome
Mr Awesome
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by martini161 »

it all depends on how far the server you speed tested to was, the kind of connection you have, and how well (if at all) your tcp/ip stack is tweaked. for example, i have the fastest internet availible in my area (other than like a t1 or something, but im not spending that much :P ) so my speed test look like this

Code: Select all

 27795 kps down 5267 kps up 
which is actually faster than advertised speed :P hopefully verizon wont find out about that anytime soon 8-[
User avatar
DMB2000uk
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7095
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:36 pm
Location: UK

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by DMB2000uk »

:drool: :drool: :drool:

How much is that a month?

Dan
Image (<- Clickable)
User avatar
DaIceMan
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1599
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Springfield-ish, Missouri

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by DaIceMan »

martini161 wrote:it all depends on how far the server you speed tested to was, the kind of connection you have, and how well (if at all) your tcp/ip stack is tweaked. for example, i have the fastest internet availible in my area (other than like a t1 or something, but im not spending that much :P ) so my speed test look like this

Code: Select all

 27795 kps down 5267 kps up 
which is actually faster than advertised speed :P hopefully verizon wont find out about that anytime soon 8-[
take the last number off of both, and those are close to my speeds. 3mb/512kb advertised. down is pretty close, up is usually around 400.
Gamer - Thermaltake Element S | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Black | Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3L | Intel E8400 | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | 4GB OCZ Reaper Ram | XFX 8800GTX | Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer | Seagate 7200.10 320GB

HTPC / Folder - Palit 9600GT 1GB Sonic | AMD Phenom 9600 | Corsair DHX 4GB | ECS GF8200A | OCZ StealthXStream 500
Thanks to Palit, AMD, Corsair and ECS for sponsoring the 2008 Folding Give-away!

Image
User avatar
w00fd06
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:19 pm

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by w00fd06 »

DaIceMan wrote:take the last number off of both, and those are close to my speeds. 3mb/512kb advertised. down is pretty close, up is usually around 400.
hey, i would call even that fast, divide 27,795 kps down by 4,000 7k, and 5,267 kps up divided by 2,000 2.5k, and that proves the overwhelming power of dail-up :lol:
User avatar
Methious
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:39 am
Location: Joplin Mo.

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Methious »

That must be the good dial up, before I got my Sat internet I was getting 2.5K down gray hairs going up :shock: Were out in the sticks. Now I get 64K down not blazing but compared to the dial up 25 times faster. It's very consistent though 64K to 62K average. They just ran fiber optics past the house so were hoping that's going to mean fiber optics internet soon.
Image
User avatar
w00fd06
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:19 pm

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by w00fd06 »

Methious wrote:That must be the good dial up, before I got my Sat internet I was getting 2.5K down gray hairs going up :shock: Were out in the sticks. Now I get 64K down not blazing but compared to the dial up 25 times faster. It's very consistent though 64K to 62K average. They just ran fiber optics past the house so were hoping that's going to mean fiber optics internet soon.
how much did the satellite internet cost? cause when we tried getting it from direcway, it was like 50 bucks a month, but that was a while ago.
User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4295
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by KnightRid »

Methious wrote:That must be the good dial up, before I got my Sat internet I was getting 2.5K down gray hairs going up :shock: Were out in the sticks. Now I get 64K down not blazing but compared to the dial up 25 times faster. It's very consistent though 64K to 62K average. They just ran fiber optics past the house so were hoping that's going to mean fiber optics internet soon.
WOW - why not just go with a Wireless broadband plan from Verizon or one of the cell providers? Father-in-law pays around $60+fees a month and now that they have it fixed he easily gets the same as that 64k speed - at my house the same connection gets 1.4mbps! Just depends how the towers are in your area.

Mike

his dial up would be around 22.4 connection speed, so 2.4 whopping unbelievable fast download speed ;)
Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me :finga:
User avatar
Methious
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:39 am
Location: Joplin Mo.

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Methious »

Sat internet is still 49 a month for 512kb, I had Verizon for a while the service was fine but expensive for what I got. It's just not available for internet here. I can get WIFI using a big echo star dish in the yard, but the hot point is a truck stop and at times gets very slow. Since I work from home in my case it's a tax deduction the only down side to Sat internet is no online gaming due to the uplink/downlink lag time. Working from home has other advantages, almost any thing I get for the computer is home office improvements deductible. My better half is an accountant so it works out well.
Image
User avatar
vicaphit
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2789
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: SE Ohio

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by vicaphit »

we tried to get sat internet at my house, they cancelled installation on us 4 times due to no equipment, so we cancelled on them.

I wish they could get DSL more than 4 miles, we are just barely outside of the range.
----
Andy

New Rig: Intel Q6600 (2.7ghz), ASUS P5KC, 4GB DDR2-800, Palit 9600GT (1GB), Ultra X3 1KW (thanks LR!), Vista 64bit
Dell Rig: AMD Athlon X2 4000+ (2.1ghz), 2 GB DDR2 Ram, MSI 8800GT (512MB), Vista 32bit

PSN: VICaphit
User avatar
martini161
Mr Awesome
Mr Awesome
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by martini161 »

DMB2000uk wrote::drool: :drool: :drool:

How much is that a month?

Dan
the virizon package i get is 110 a month for internet, tv & phone all on fiber. its advertised as 95 a month but i have to pay extra for HD equipment. but even on a tube tv the picture is way better than comcast not to mention you get a free wireless G router
User avatar
Methious
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:39 am
Location: Joplin Mo.

Re: Results from Speed Test, is this good or bad?

Post by Methious »

They canceled install on me twice on the Sat internet, lack of equipment. Called the Sat installer instead of dish network directly, 3 days later he showed up. There is a shortage of equipment, he said some people are waiting 6 months or more.
Image
Post Reply