E6750 vs E6850

This is the place to discuss the latest computer hardware issues and technology. Please keep the discussion ON TOPIC!
Post Reply
bandieramonte
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

E6750 vs E6850

Post by bandieramonte »

I've been looking the technical differences between the E6750 and the E6850 processors and the only difference lays on its operating frequencies. I just want to know if the E6850 is simply an overclocked version of the E6750 or if E6850 has improvements on its architecture that naturally provides it with more speed without overclocking it.
Thanks.
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by FZ1 »

They are basically the same chip except the 6750 has an 8x multi and the 6850 has a 9x multi. Same rated bus speed, etc. If you are going to overclock, the extra multiplier can be useful but it's not essential.
Joe
bandieramonte
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by bandieramonte »

So, does this mean that if I overclock the E6750 to 3 ghdz, then I would exactly have a E6850? If this is true, it would be very stupid to buy E6850 for $100 more.
User avatar
maj0r_pawnage
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:16 pm
Location: Toronto Ontario

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by maj0r_pawnage »

well yeah you would, but dont forget you can also oc the e6850 :), and it can be found @ pretty good prices on ebay
E6300 @ 3.51GHz 1.392v
Asus Maximus Formula
Antec 550Watt Psu
Mushkin DDR-1206@ 5-5-5-15 / 2.28v
Zalman CPU Cooler CNPS7700
6408800GTS(OC 691MHz Core/2.132GHz Mem)
2x80mm case fans +2x120mm case fans
bandieramonte
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by bandieramonte »

Exactly, but if E6850 is simply an overclocked version of E6750, the It wouldn't make much sense to buy E6850 an overclock it, because it would mean like to overclock a E6750 even more. So I think it would be better to buy a E6750 and overclock it past 3ghdz with a good processor cooler. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by FZ1 »

bandieramonte wrote:So, does this mean that if I overclock the E6750 to 3 ghdz, then I would exactly have a E6850? If this is true, it would be very stupid to buy E6850 for $100 more.
Yep. However, if you want to get a mcuh higher overclock, the E6750 may not OC as much because you would end up being limited by your FSB or RAM due to the lower multiplier. For example, if the highest FSB you can get with your MB and/or RAM is 400 you would have the following:

E6750 = 8x400 = 3.2GHz
E6850 = 9x400 = 3.6GHz

That is the benefit of the more expensive CPU. That's why the "extreme" versions have the multiplier unlocked so you can raise it to 10, 11, etc and keep your FSB low if your hardware has limitations.
Joe
User avatar
Bio-Hazard
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Back Woods Of MO.

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by Bio-Hazard »

I'd go for the cheaper CPU and OC it (that's what I've done), its just the cheaper way of doing things.................... :mrgreen: . If you're not into OC'ing the E6850 is the safer route.
bandieramonte
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by bandieramonte »

FZ1 wrote: Yep. However, if you want to get a mcuh higher overclock, the E6750 may not OC as much because you would end up being limited by your FSB or RAM due to the lower multiplier. For example, if the highest FSB you can get with your MB and/or RAM is 400 you would have the following:

E6750 = 8x400 = 3.2GHz
E6850 = 9x400 = 3.6GHz

That is the benefit of the more expensive CPU. That's why the "extreme" versions have the multiplier unlocked so you can raise it to 10, 11, etc and keep your FSB low if your hardware has limitations.
Let's suppose my motherboard is the EVGA 122-CK-NF67-T1 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI ATX Intel Motherboard, having FSB 1333/1066MHz. Then according to your equation:

E6750 = 8x1333 = 10.6GHz
E6850 = 9x1333 = 12GHz

Is this correct?
User avatar
Bio-Hazard
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Back Woods Of MO.

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by Bio-Hazard »

bandieramonte wrote:
FZ1 wrote: Yep. However, if you want to get a mcuh higher overclock, the E6750 may not OC as much because you would end up being limited by your FSB or RAM due to the lower multiplier. For example, if the highest FSB you can get with your MB and/or RAM is 400 you would have the following:

E6750 = 8x400 = 3.2GHz
E6850 = 9x400 = 3.6GHz

That is the benefit of the more expensive CPU. That's why the "extreme" versions have the multiplier unlocked so you can raise it to 10, 11, etc and keep your FSB low if your hardware has limitations.
Let's suppose my motherboard is the EVGA 122-CK-NF67-T1 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI ATX Intel Motherboard, having FSB 1333/1066MHz. Then according to your equation:

E6750 = 8x1333 = 10.6GHz
E6850 = 9x1333 = 12GHz

Is this correct?
Nope, completely and totally wrong.............. 8)

1333 is the quad pumped rating, the internal FSB of the CPU's is 333 MHz making them

8 x 333 = 2.66
9 x 333 = 3

......... :mrgreen:
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by FZ1 »

Bio-Hazard wrote:
bandieramonte wrote:
FZ1 wrote: Yep. However, if you want to get a mcuh higher overclock, the E6750 may not OC as much because you would end up being limited by your FSB or RAM due to the lower multiplier. For example, if the highest FSB you can get with your MB and/or RAM is 400 you would have the following:

E6750 = 8x400 = 3.2GHz
E6850 = 9x400 = 3.6GHz

That is the benefit of the more expensive CPU. That's why the "extreme" versions have the multiplier unlocked so you can raise it to 10, 11, etc and keep your FSB low if your hardware has limitations.
Let's suppose my motherboard is the EVGA 122-CK-NF67-T1 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI ATX Intel Motherboard, having FSB 1333/1066MHz. Then according to your equation:

E6750 = 8x1333 = 10.6GHz
E6850 = 9x1333 = 12GHz

Is this correct?
Nope, completely and totally wrong.............. 8)

1333 is the quad pumped rating, the internal FSB of the CPU's is 333 MHz making them

8 x 333 = 2.66
9 x 333 = 3

......... :mrgreen:
Right - the effective FSB is FSB x 4 and the effective DDR2 speed is FSB x 2 so keep this in mind when dealign with RAM.
Joe
bandieramonte
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by bandieramonte »

Wait wait. I'm confused, this is new to me.

This 333 is the internal FSB of the processor, ok that I understand. But what I don't still get is, how to increase this 333? On what does it depends this increase? On the motherboard? Please post an example with this EVGA motherboard I just posted. With this motherboards, up to how much can I overclock both of this processors?
User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by kenc51 »

I'd also go for the E6750 over the E6850.

You will be able to OC the E6850 more than the E6750 or to the same MHz but with lower voltage, but you're not going to notice the real world difference between the two, even if one is clocked ~400MHz faster.
What you will notice is the hole in your pocket after buying an E6850 ;)

Most E6750's will OC to ~3.7GHz with high voltage while most E6850's will OC to between ~3.8 to 4.2GHz with high voltage.

Anything over ~3.6GHz is normally too much for air cooling btw.
User avatar
FZ1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: E6750 vs E6850

Post by FZ1 »

bandieramonte wrote:Wait wait. I'm confused, this is new to me.

This 333 is the internal FSB of the processor, ok that I understand. But what I don't still get is, how to increase this 333? On what does it depends this increase? On the motherboard? Please post an example with this EVGA motherboard I just posted. With this motherboards, up to how much can I overclock both of this processors?
In your BIOS there is an option to increase/decrease the FSB. See the overclocking how to thread in the Intel CPU section http://forums.legitreviews.com/about10789.html
Joe
Post Reply