How many Playstation 3 Cells can you get on a wafer?

This is the place to discuss the latest computer hardware issues and technology. Please keep the discussion ON TOPIC!
Post Reply
User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

How many Playstation 3 Cells can you get on a wafer?

Post by kenc51 »

The Inquirer have some pics of IBM's PlayStation chip....Looks BIG.... (this is a pic of a 12" wafer, IBM must have great yields!)

Image
User avatar
Dragon_Cooler
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2405
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:17 am
Location: DFW Texas
Contact:

Post by Dragon_Cooler »

i would love to see the real thing, the ps3 that is. Im not much of a console gamer, but i do have my eye on the ps3. I cant wait to see the graphics in real time!
Image
Tim Burton
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:10 am

Post by Tim Burton »

Why make a square chip on a round plate?

Also, did they make 1/2 chips at the edge?
User avatar
Yuriman
Legit Enthusiast
Legit Enthusiast
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:34 pm

Post by Yuriman »

The round plate is part of the manufacturing processor, which is definantly worth a google. Very interesting. And, as far as I know, the chips at the edge are non-functional.
User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

Post by kenc51 »

Tim Burton wrote:Why make a square chip on a round plate?

Also, did they make 1/2 chips at the edge?
They make chips kinda like your photos get developed.... they use Lithography.... Have you ever seen when a photo is being developed, they shine an image of what they want onto paper, then a chemical reaction takes place where the chemical changes color and sticks to the paper.... Well CPU's etc. are kinda made like this... htey are round simply because the equipment they use is round (also allows better yeilds)

Yes the half chips are dead and worth nothing, normally the best chips are taken from the centre, theese are the mobile cpu's or hi-end cpu's

How Stuff Works has an easy'ish explanation
User avatar
bigblockmatt
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:01 am
Location: California

Post by bigblockmatt »

cool article, thanks!!
User avatar
gvblake22
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Northern Michigan
Contact:

Post by gvblake22 »

kenc51 wrote:How Stuff Works has an easy'ish explanation
That's crazy! :rolleyes:
What amazes me more than the actual manufacturing process of a processor, is how someone could even think of it to begin with!!!
Like two guys (or gals) were just sitting in by a fire sipping some hot cocoa and discussing technology and silicon and they thought that, "maybe if we direct a laser at a jet of xenon gas to heat it up and create plasma and then condense the subsequently released electrons and pattern them onto a mirror creating something we can call 'extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) light', we could be able to carve transistors in silicon wafers and create the most powerful microprocessors the world has ever seen!!!"

Then the other guy says:
"BRILLIANT!!"

(think Guinness commercial...) ;)
Trollhunter
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:37 pm

Post by Trollhunter »

WoW that a big CPU what happen to things getting smaller. I use to work for intel we had over 50 P4 in an 8 inc wafer.
User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

Post by kenc51 »

Trollhunter wrote:WoW that a big CPU what happen to things getting smaller. I use to work for intel we had over 50 P4 in an 8 inc wafer.
Isn't it a CELL proc??? They have "mini-cpu's" inside them...(multi-core of some kind) There are general purpose and specialised parts cpu thingys in 'em......(not to get too techie)
Ars Technica have details on the CELL (all you need to know)
Part 1
Part 2

Taken from Ars Technica... (kudos to them!)
Image
Post Reply