Nice review, in fact your review is better than most I've seen regarding this new TIM, but with all respect to the reviewer, the testing has a bit of room for improvement. You tested it for 72 hours and not the recommended 200+ hours and many thermal cycles that Arctic Silver 5 needs to attain maximum performance. All is not lost though, perhaps a follow up with results after 200 hours and many thermal cycles would be a good thing. You guys always do good reviews here, and I was surprised you didn't let it break in to maximum performance after 200 hours.
I saw this other review by Tweaknews.net,
http://www.tweaknews.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=82429 ; and not only is the testing conducted imporperly, the admin and reviewer has no business doing reviews if he's going to make up his own testing methodology on the fly, he's the one in that thread that's seriously mistaken. I would rebut his nonsense, except that site has an antiquated registration system, each registration has to be manually approved, so until they approve my registration, I can't set this reviewer straight.
If he thinks he knows more than the manufacturer and others that know a bit more than him about silver TIM testing, he's grossly mistaken. You guys have a few threads in this forum like this
http://forums.legitreviews.com/post526. ... paste#p526, and this was a direct result from my Silver paste article back in 03
http://www.overclockers.com/articles938/
On a sidenote, soon as I get a tube of this AI Cool Silver, I plan to test it myself, starting with testing the Ag content, then test it for performance with at least 200 hours and many thermal cycles.
PS, I think that the X method of applying this paste is a bit silly, but I can't say for sure until I test it myself. Kind of hard to find this TIM for sale, and I prefer to not get samples from the manufacturer for many reasons. But that's just my preference.
Stay cool,
Silversinksam