Sky Hawk update at [M]
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 3:38 pm
I want to aplogize for the way my article read. While i tried to ensure the unit's failure to meet standards was at the forefront, my ignorance concerning the guidelines themselves became emeshed in a review which also may have been cobntrsued as an attack on Legit. it went in too many directions and the one that troubles me most is it's reading as a criticims of some great journalism here. I hope the update below rectifies this.
It's often the cae we cannot see ourselves and that the outlook of others can help us grow, at the very least see our errors. I hope you will enjoy the updated article. While it's not always easy to alow criticism to penetrate the thick skin we wear to protect ourselves from a calous world, doing so can give us tremendous opportunity for growth. Thanks Nate for being a mentor not a mental such as I am: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getart ... rticID=320

It's often the cae we cannot see ourselves and that the outlook of others can help us grow, at the very least see our errors. I hope you will enjoy the updated article. While it's not always easy to alow criticism to penetrate the thick skin we wear to protect ourselves from a calous world, doing so can give us tremendous opportunity for growth. Thanks Nate for being a mentor not a mental such as I am: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getart ... rticID=320
