Page 1 of 1

Corsair XMS 3200XL Memory

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 10:54 am
by Apoptosis
Those who said that 2-2-2 timings were no longer an option on current memory modules has been proved wrong. Corsair's new XMS XL series offers some of the best performance we have ever seen from a DDR1 module and you don't have to sell your car to purchase it!

Image

Almost PC-3500 @ 2-2-2-5: 1T!!

Click Here for the full review!!!!

What you guys think?

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 12:58 pm
by Bio-Hazard
That sure looks like some great ram............I could use some in my AMD system.................Best I can get out of my Mushkin is 2,3,2,11 @ 220 FSB, but that's at 2.85v........ 8)

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 2:07 pm
by infinitevalence
Good review guys. :P

now GIMMY :)

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 3:11 pm
by Sublime
Good review guys. That looks like some good memory.

I know you are going to Taiwan for a couple weeks, but when you get back you need to put it on another board and throw 3.2+ Volts at them!

Posted: Mon May 31, 2004 10:28 am
by flyboi
Thanks for the review guys. Fyi, i just registered to show my huge interest :D . This ram is great bcoz can do 2225 at 215FSB at 2.75Vdimm. Even the BH5 struggle to do that if i'm right. Anyway, i wonder wether this ram loves voltage like the BH5/6 or not. If this ram can do 250FSB at 2225 at 3.3Vdimm or lower, definitely we have another low latency and overclockable crown in the making. Anybody can come out with the o/c result at high Vdimm? Hope that it is another champion at 250FSB at low 2225 setting.

let's fly high.

Cheers.

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:50 pm
by mlauzon
Now, why don't you do the testing of DDR1 & DDR2 on an AMD-based system...as not everyone is an Intel user so I believe that your review is one-sided!!!

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:56 pm
by Apoptosis
what current AMD system uses DDR2?

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:19 pm
by infinitevalence
NONE !!! you will have to wait until 2005 for that. and thats if AMD feels like it.

Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:27 pm
by Illuminati
mlauzon wrote:Now, why don't you do the testing of DDR1 & DDR2 on an AMD-based system...as not everyone is an Intel user so I believe that your review is one-sided!!!
hmm... ya... I was going to laugh, but I'll educate instead.

Read the above post. ^