Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
Article Title: Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/intel-core- ... iew_122714
Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
Re: Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
I'm very curious, how the intel 4820K would stuck up against it's bigger brothers and Haswell? This question I think would be more appealing to most users and enthusiasts. Otherwise, nice review as allways
Last edited by sbohdan on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Main rig: NZXT Phantom modded case with Danger Den WC, Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite, Ryzen 5800X @ stock, 32GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200Mhz 16-18-18-36-1T, AMD RX 5700XT + AlphaCool WC, ACER Nitro XV2 27", SP 1TB nvme PCiE GEN3, Samsung 2TB; Cooler Master MW Gold 650W, Win10 Pro 64
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=
- Apoptosis
- Site Admin
- Posts: 33941
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri
- Contact:
Re: Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
Totally agree, but Intel did not send any out to us before the launch.sbohdan wrote:I'm very curious, how the intel 4820K stuck up against it's bigger brothers and Haswell? This question I think would be more appealing to most users and enthusiasts. Otherwise, nice review as allways
That said... a quad-core Ivy Bridge-E 4820K versus a quad-core Haswell 4770K wouldn't be a battle as it would be 8-threads each. Same turbo speed (3.9GHz), but the 4820K would have 2MB more cache.
In the end I would expect to see that Haswell would have it on both price, power consumption and performance, not to mention a lower platform build cost.
For $279 the 4770K is hard to pass up.
Re: Intel Core i7-4960X Ivy Bridge-E Processor Review
Pretty disappointing to anyone who isn't running servers. Too bad Intel gives their "enthusiasts" whom are willing to spend more money older technology than their counterparts. I don't know about you, but that sounds like a bad idea.