Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
- Apoptosis
- Site Admin
- Posts: 33941
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri
- Contact:
Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
Now that AMD's AM2 processors have been unleased into the wild, AMD users now have to make the transition over to DDR2 memory as DDR1 modules will no longer do the job needed. Today we take a look at 667MHz versus 800MHz modules, different memory timings, and a 2GB kit versus a 4GB kit of low latency memory. We managed to increase DOOM 3 performance by nearly 19 percent as a result.
Article Title: Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
Now that AMD's AM2 processors have been unleased into the wild, AMD users now have to make the transition over to DDR2 memory as DDR1 modules will no longer do the job needed. Today we take a look at 667MHz versus 800MHz modules, different memory timings, and a 2GB kit versus a 4GB kit of low latency memory. We managed to increase DOOM 3 performance by nearly 19 percent as a result.
Article Title: Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
- Illuminati
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:48 am
- Location: Wright City, Missouri, USA
- Contact:
- infinitevalence
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:40 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
- bigblockmatt
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:01 am
- Location: California
so wait. what your telling me is that your not suppose to install memory like this?
comp specs- too lazy to make a cool looking sig... MB:GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P, AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition 2.8Ghz, CORSAIR TW3X4G1333C9DHX 4GB PC3-10666, ASUS Radeon HD 4870 512MB, SB audigy gamer, WESTERN DIGITAL Caviar Black 500GB, antec P180 case (extra 120mm fan and 80mm fan), Corsair HX Series 620W: ASSEMBLED June 2009
Re: Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
I don't know what the author was trying to convey, but it certainly was one of the most biased review I've seen even if it was done unintentionally.
- kenc51
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
Please explain!wuzy wrote:I don't know what the author was trying to convey, but it certainly was one of the most biased review I've seen even if it was done unintentionally.
- Apoptosis
- Site Admin
- Posts: 33941
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri
- Contact:
Re: Corsair PC2-6400C3 Meets AMD's AM2 Processors
Wuzy... Look at the last couple lines of page onekenc51 wrote:Please explain!wuzy wrote:I don't know what the author was trying to convey, but it certainly was one of the most biased review I've seen even if it was done unintentionally.
How can I be biased when I'm trying to find the best settings to play a game at? If you are saying I'm biased for using just Corsair memory in the article that too is not the case. Corsair Memory is the only memory company that has CL5, CL4, and CL3 memory at PC2-6400 on the market. Corsair was also the NVIDIA nForce 500 series launch partners and sent out their lastest memory to reviewers for the launch, so I had enough samples to run these tests with. I hope this helps clear things up. This article wasn't so much a "review" on Corsair's memory it's a look at the importance of the memory when it comes to performance on AMD's AM2 processor family.Today we take a look at the importance memory plays when using AMD's new AM2 platform. Our goal in this article is to find the best memory settings for gaming and our benchmark tool is DOOM 3.
I appologize for my comments earlier.
At first it came to me it was biased because several AMD fanboy blog sites claimed your article showing "up to 20% improvement over Socket 939".
After carefully reading through the review and realizing it's a pure S-AM2 comparison with zero S939 involvement, I'm fully statisfied with the article.
In the future I would suggest make the distinction between the socket types used clearer even if it's just comparing on socket type.
Cheers
At first it came to me it was biased because several AMD fanboy blog sites claimed your article showing "up to 20% improvement over Socket 939".
After carefully reading through the review and realizing it's a pure S-AM2 comparison with zero S939 involvement, I'm fully statisfied with the article.
In the future I would suggest make the distinction between the socket types used clearer even if it's just comparing on socket type.
Cheers