ZZZZZZZZZZ......ZZZZZZZZZ..... see, I don't know what it is about American*yawn* History, it just puts me to sleepTim Burton wrote: Just wanted to point out a couple of things:
1. The Abolitionists were as Pro-seceding as the South was. They knew that would mean that the South would no longer get their slaves back and make it economically untenable. All throughout the 1850s most wanted to break from the South.
2. The real issue was not slavery, but State's Rights. So much so that when the Corwin Amendment (making Slavery legal forever) was offered, and had a realistic chance of passing, the South still rejected it and decided to secede. Even Lincoln was willing to accept the Corwin Amendment (He says so in his First Inaugural Address paragraph 29.
http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres31.html
Text of the Corwin Amendment:
3. The generals on both sides were split about even on the subject of slavery. Lee even freed his in 1862 at the height of his victories, and Stonewall broke state law to teach slaves to read at church.No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

J/K, it is interesting, just not my cup'o'tea...nothing past like the 1200's really holds much interest for me.
