Legit Reviews

Nice!

gross

intersting how much they made it look like a 1969

I'm beginning to think that a whole lot of car manufacturers are trying to pull an old-school stunt, presumably for the older generation (middle-age I mean ).....they could have come out better on the front end insert though, the '69 looked a lot better than this knock-off. Elsewise, the body lines are nice.

edit: wonder what's next: Chevy and GMC Suburbans with the "snub-nosed" look again? rofl

what's next a gto?

would be nice to see a goat with classic lines, but alass it will prolly never happen.

as for the camaro, I hope that its just the proto and the front clip will not look like that.

guys, they already have a goat out, and it's got 400 HP, muhahahaha:

http://www.pontiac.com/gto/index.jsp

still too expensive when you consider how much the Challenger is going to be (thought I heard 28k for the 425HP 6.1 Hemi).....and the Challenger is still uber uber more sexy than the goat, no matter what it starts out at price-wise, lol

edit: ya, it could use the muscle car look for damn sure....looks too neutered as is.

My eyes they burn!!

I had to get artificial eyes after looking at "the goat of Satan", roflmao...can't see too well out em though

That Camaro looks alot like the revamp of the Mustang except the front, but it's uglier.

The inside of that GTO looks nice, the outside looks like a Neon with a spoiler lol, from behind.

killswitch83 wrote:I'm beginning to think that a whole lot of car manufacturers are trying to pull an old-school stunt, presumably for the older generation (middle-age I mean ).....they could have come out better on the front end insert though, the '69 looked a lot better than this knock-off. Elsewise, the body lines are nice.

edit: wonder what's next: Chevy and GMC Suburbans with the "snub-nosed" look again? rofl

i love the vintage muscle car looks because i think vintage muscle cars look sweet as hell. however, i don't think that this is close enough to the vintage look, unlike the mustang and challenger

the car just looks way too bulky to me (just like the new charger) and the grill looks stupid.

yeah, you're right on that one.....they could have done more to make the grill a lot more like the older Camaro, instead of some fusion of new and old like we see here.....tell ya something though, if I, by some miracle, get my CCNA, I will invest some money in a Challenger....uber, uber sexiness

Damn, you guys all really hate that thing don't ya!
I'll be the odd man out and say that I think it looks kinda good. Yeah, I've seen much better looking cars, but I don't think this is ugly at all

gvblake22 wrote:Damn, you guys all really hate that thing don't ya!
I'll be the odd man out and say that I think it looks kinda good. Yeah, I've seen much better looking cars, but I don't think this is ugly at all

to me it feels like it doesn't deserve to be called a camero...

kinda like how the new gto doesn't deserve to be called a gto and how the charger doesn't deserve to be called a charger... but to a much lesser degree. these are all cars that make me scratch my head in wonderment, whereas i can understand where chevy was trying to go with the camero...

I want to see Ford resurrect the Shelby GT350 or GT500 or even the Cobra in a really bad way!!! image replacing the 4-speed with a 6-speed and dropping the 429 Hemi in it....holy crap hold on to your gunny sack, lol.....

I don't even like Fords and that's one car I can see myself in, heheh

GUYS SORRY - TYPO!!!! This is the 2009 Camaro

that thing looks like junk. as for the GTO, seen it, drive it, it was nice, it was fast, it was fun.

actually I like the looks of it. I have no idea why you guys are saying that it looks bad

From 2007 to 2009?? Ahhhh

Vstrom wrote:GUYS SORRY - TYPO!!!! This is the 2009 Camaro

doesn't matter to me... still looks gross.

sbohdan wrote:actually I like the looks of it. I have no idea why you guys are saying that it looks bad

because it doesn't look like a gto and because it looks bulky