Red Alert 3
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:38 pm
..ugh... i have had basically every command and conquer rts game since... well command and conquer the original way back when. I must say.. red alert 3 is by far THE WORST of any of the games so far...
Ok so i haven't finished game yet just done the soviet campaign... but I dont see things changing.. the co-commander stuff basically removes any tactical planning (in my opinion)... cause no matter what you do your co command will attack... you can tell them to take and hold a position but after maybe 5mins or less they lose interest and attack again. This wouldnt be so annoying except you share resources with them.... trying to accumulate resources.. good luck.. they'll just spend them. I wouldnt mind the co commander if it was like other games where essentially they are seperate players with different resource pool.. but if you play game single player you essentially end up with someone stealing your money... I feel like I am fighting with the co-commander for money. Want to build a big air armada and kick some ass... nope... ai commander is building subs and you end up with money ticking in slowly.. I just ended up having endless queues so at least i could build some units. Money only starts to accumulate properly so late in a mission that you no longer care because enemy is going to die soon anyway. No joy of building 100 infantry just watch them die when a tank rolls over them.. or other C+C things..
Now I know some people might say great co-op.. fine.. good for you.. but if I want to just play the game myself why the f-ck can't I.
I liked c+c 3... how the hell did they get it so wrong. Take out the co-commanders and the game might actually be ok.. (Though so far the fmvs arent as funny or fun as the other games.. I dont know but the professional actors just dont work as well as the unknowns they used to use).. at the moment I am just annoyed I was looking forward to playing RA 3 not any more.
Ok so i haven't finished game yet just done the soviet campaign... but I dont see things changing.. the co-commander stuff basically removes any tactical planning (in my opinion)... cause no matter what you do your co command will attack... you can tell them to take and hold a position but after maybe 5mins or less they lose interest and attack again. This wouldnt be so annoying except you share resources with them.... trying to accumulate resources.. good luck.. they'll just spend them. I wouldnt mind the co commander if it was like other games where essentially they are seperate players with different resource pool.. but if you play game single player you essentially end up with someone stealing your money... I feel like I am fighting with the co-commander for money. Want to build a big air armada and kick some ass... nope... ai commander is building subs and you end up with money ticking in slowly.. I just ended up having endless queues so at least i could build some units. Money only starts to accumulate properly so late in a mission that you no longer care because enemy is going to die soon anyway. No joy of building 100 infantry just watch them die when a tank rolls over them.. or other C+C things..
Now I know some people might say great co-op.. fine.. good for you.. but if I want to just play the game myself why the f-ck can't I.
I liked c+c 3... how the hell did they get it so wrong. Take out the co-commanders and the game might actually be ok.. (Though so far the fmvs arent as funny or fun as the other games.. I dont know but the professional actors just dont work as well as the unknowns they used to use).. at the moment I am just annoyed I was looking forward to playing RA 3 not any more.