1.55 best times 1000/2000/2000skier wrote:7k stock seems semi-accurateApoptosis wrote: Not sure how you got you 7,000 PPD estimate, but that looks way low from what I am getting in results.
personally at 1730 shaders:
1min 37 ish
makes my GPU run way hotter too (50C load instead of 44C)[17:39:27] Project: 6800 (Run 486, Clone 0, Gen 3)
[17:39:27]
[17:39:27] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[17:39:27] Entering M.D.
[17:39:29] Tpr hash work/wudata_09.tpr: 3746215936 596123763 920395843 1139183513 731178145
[17:39:29] Working on PEPTIDE (1-42)
[17:39:29] Client config found, loading data.
[17:39:29] Starting GUI Server
[17:41:06] Completed 500001 out of 50000016 steps (1%).
[17:42:42] Completed 1000001 out of 50000016 steps (2%).
[17:44:19] Completed 1500001 out of 50000016 steps (3%).
[17:45:56] Completed 2000001 out of 50000016 steps (4%).
[17:47:32] Completed 2500001 out of 50000016 steps (5%).
so the newer units actually favor more shaders, good for the 460 owners, bad for the new 450 owners
Project ID: 6800
Core: OPENMMGPU
Credit: 1298
Frames: 100
Name: amdgpu
Path: \\A\Folding@home-gpu\
Number of Frames Observed: 300
Min. Time / Frame : 00:02:01 - 9,268.4 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:09 - 8,693.6 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:02:09 - 8,693.6 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:02:09 - 8,693.6 PPD
All Time / Frame : 00:02:09 - 8,693.6 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:02:24 - 7,788.0 PPD
Name: mircogpu
Path: \\Aaaaaaa\Folding@homegpu\
Number of Frames Observed: 300
Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:55 - 9,751.9 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:01 - 9,268.4 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:01:56 - 9,667.9 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:01:55 - 9,751.9 PPD
All Time / Frame : 00:02:01 - 9,268.4 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:02:01 - 9,268.4 PPD