Page 1 of 1
Dual core folding?
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 7:09 am
by DX
Has anyone got this folding project running two instances on a dual core. Each running on its own core? I figure it would help our score, but I don't want to put in the work if it doesn't work.
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 7:59 am
by Darkstar
depends on which OS and version of folding you are running. I have the Windows text only console running on 2 cores. The SMP version runs on 2 cores but cant be installed as a service.
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:16 am
by DMB2000uk
The best way to get points on a dual core is to do the Virtual machine Linux SMP, see
this thread.
Dan
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:22 am
by Illuminati
Yes, you get a ton more points per day running the Linux SMP client over two single core instances.
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 9:35 am
by Darkstar
Just curious but how does it get a ton more points? I have the Windows smp running on a system(E6400 stock) next to me and it gets 1760 points (project 2604) How much more does the Virtual Linux SMP get?
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:38 am
by Illuminati
Darkstar wrote:Just curious but how does it get a ton more points? I have the Windows smp running on a system(E6400 stock) next to me and it gets 1760 points (project 2604) How much more does the Virtual Linux SMP get?
I was comparing the Linux SMP to the Windows non-SMP... I can't vouch for the Windows SMP other than it doesn't play nice with Vista. I imagine the Linux SMP and Windows SMP should be close to equal.
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 3:15 pm
by DX
I'm running XP Pro on a 6300. It isn't pegging the CPU on both cores so I figure it might be possible to install a second copy in another directory. Then get the first one going set the affinity to cpu 0 and the second to cpu 1 and that should do it. I would just have to lookup how to automate setting the affinity of each copy in XP. I just setup the graphical client. I suppose that it only works on the text client to get both cores maxed out correct?
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:43 pm
by DMB2000uk
Seriously dude, SMP is the way to go. You can get like 1500ppd compared to 600ppd with two windows clients with affinities set to 0 and 1.
Dan
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:54 pm
by Darkstar
ditto on the SMP advice, If you have a dual core its the only way to go, W$ or nix, it outperforms everything else.
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:04 am
by KnightRid
"Illuminati... I can't vouch for the Windows SMP other than it doesn't play nice with Vista.
I have had the smp on Vista since I built the dual core machine, and have had no problems at all..??
Just add it to your startup group and away it goes
Mike
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:53 am
by Illuminati
KnightRid wrote:Illuminati wrote:... I can't vouch for the Windows SMP other than it doesn't play nice with Vista.
I have had the smp on Vista since I built the dual core machine, and have had no problems at all..??
Just add it to your startup group and away it goes
Mike
Ya, I know there are success stories, but I'm definitely not the only one that had some serious problems with it. I was never able to successfully complete a work unit following the same instructions posted on the Stanford Folding website.
I'm perfectly happy with my VMWare solution... it's been 100% stable for me

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:12 am
by DX
Yep SMP client pegs it out. I'm just hesitant to use beta stuff.
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:38 am
by shadco
My testament to SMP folding under linux
7 machines 10K ppd day average
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:19 pm
by DX
How well does this work on a quad core? And has anyone got a dual quad core setup?
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:09 pm
by Darkstar
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:46 pm
by vbironchef
I have a quad core. I am worried about beta as well. Don't want to lose any data on my hard drives. Is it SAFE?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:13 am
by DX
I doubt that you would loose data. I was more concerned with the fact of stability as I'm running it on my office computer. I didn't want to be in the middle of something and loose a few hours of work cause the beta made my system reboot.