Microsoft's increasing concern over information security has translated into its decision to bite the bullet and make its upcoming SP2 (Service Pack 2) security patch available to all users - including those using pirated copies of its Windows XP software.
"We haven't explicitly done anything to SP2 to exclude it from pirated copies," said Microsoft group product manager Barry Goffe. The United States-based executive was interviewed via telephone.
This is unlike SP1 (Service Pack 1), which had features to prevent users with pirated copies from downloading it. In SP2's case, the mammoth 80MB to 250MB patch can be downloaded and installed on computers running both legitimate and pirated copies.
I'm actually glad to see that Microsoft is going to help everyone in this situation! They didn't do with SP1a as noted in the below quote:
This is unlike SP1 (Service Pack 1), which had features to prevent users with pirated copies from downloading it. In SP2's case, the mammoth 80MB to 250MB patch can be downloaded and installed on computers running both legitimate and pirated copies.
Yes I am.............normally every time there is a update or a version change I get a email...........I haven't heard a thing after they released RC1.
Bio-Hazard wrote:Yes I am.............normally every time there is a update or a version change I get a email...........I haven't heard a thing after they released RC1.
I am a tester also and never received an e-mail but if you login to the windowsbeta site you may see something newer than RC1.
"In a nutshell, Microsoft group product manager Barry Goffe told ComputerTimes that Windows XP Service Pack 2 would not exclude pirated copies from upgrading, and that it was more important to keep user safe than to be "concerned about the revenue issue."
To clarify its position, a Microsoft spokesperson told BetaNews, "Press reports indicating Windows XP Service Pack 2 will install on pirated or illegal copies of Windows XP are not entirely true. Prior to installing, SP2 will check the OS' product ID (PID) against a list of known pirated PIDs. If a PID is found to be invalid, SP2 will not install." "
Apoptosis wrote:I know this may be of interest to some people!
I'm actually glad to see that Microsoft is going to help everyone in this situation! They didn't do with SP1a as noted in the below quote:
Umm.. sorry to perhaps be a spoilsport here but why the hell should they support people in "this situation" (by which I assume you mean people with pirated copies).
If you haven't paid for the software, it seems a bit tight to expect to be treated to free official updates.
But it seems fairly likely that they simply can't be bothered. This is good. The less money spent on anti-piracy the cheaper software can be and the fewer people will actually go out and pirate it (in my humble opinion).
I did alot of research after the thread got started the other night on SP2, according to every beta tester I talked to and posts I read, there are alot of people with pirated copies who's OS is completely unfunctional after downloading the SP2 update. So if you do have a pirated copy, don't do it.
I have to call MS every time I install a new piece on my system because I have exceeded the number of installs, other than always getting someone who doesn't speak englis, it isn't a hard process but is annoying. I can't even download the new service pack beta because it would make me call support to reactivate my copy of Windows. I have heard the 26th of this month for the next Beta release (final) and the first week of July for the public release.
RC2 is supposed to be out this week last I heard. RC1 ver. 2120 is the latest that is out right now, and it's not very good, crashes my IE everytime I go to properties for anything on the web.........really sucks......
I'm a Beta tester and I haven't heard a thing as of yet........and there isn't anything new on the beta site yet either..........I wonder what's up........
I have 6 computer in my house. all pirated additions of xp pro. and all have sp1a running on them, its not a problem to get passed their service packs, all you need to do is generate your own product key, DUH.
See, I disagree. I paid for my OS, alot of money. people who play by the rules have to pay more because of people who go arounfd the rules or cheat the system. I don't think it is fair or right. If I pay for it, you should pay for it, simple as that. Like Eminem once said "If you can afford to go buy (or build) a $500 computer, then you can afford to pay $15 for a CD".
If you built something, or authored something, you want to make money. How would you feel if someone stole your stuff, or didn't pay you to use it? Probably be pretty ticked off. You might say a few copies won't hurt a billion dollar corporation, but what if thousands are doing it.
I think if you can afford a computer, you can afford to pay for an OS just like the rest of us.
A thief is a thief, doesn't matter if it is a candy bar, or a $130 OS......course that just my opinion.
i can understand that, but the anti piracy actions ms did in the past never worked
it won't stop the thieves, except for a few noobs (the ones without a 1334 friend ) that shouldn't get a computer anyway , who will compromise YOUR computer
i didn't buy my current OS, i did by 2000, 98 & 95 and i don't think my opinion would have been different if it was about one of the OS i do own
security is a greater good IMO
Wuzy unless you paid with your own $$ for those keys they are not legal. They would beconcidered stolen. They may work because they are not keys off the internet.
"Don't open that! It's an alien planet! Is there air? You don't know!"
you know, I just don't understand it, stealing is stealing, and it is wrong. there are plenty of programs and such i want, but sometimes I have to make sacrifices to get them, or just wait until i can afford them.
I also think that stealing these programs makes them more expensive for people like me who pay for them.
Just think what some of these people could accomplish if they spent more time making these programs better than trying to get around the system.
Its just my opinion, but the law should be going after theft odf software as hard as they are going after people who steal music.