Are AMD's new model numbers confusing?

Discussions about AMD Processors and overclocking. Need help with that new AMD CPU or not sure which one to buy? Like to void your warranty? This is the place for you! Please keep the topic on Processors only!
Post Reply
User avatar
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Are AMD's new model numbers confusing?

Post by Apoptosis » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:38 am

Holy Crap... Are you guys confused yet?

Code: Select all

Pins    Model No.   Clock        Cache      HT 
754      2800+      1800MHz      512K      800MHz 
754      3000+      2000MHz      512K      800MHz 
754      3200+      2000MHz      1MB       800MHz 
754      3200+      2200MHz      512K      800MHz
754      3300+      2400MHz      256K      800MHz 
754      3400+      2200MHz      1MB       800MHz 
754      3400+      2400MHz      512K      800MHz
754      3700+      2400MHz      1MB       800MHz 
939      3000+      1800MHz      512K      1GHz 
939      3200+      2000MHz      512K      1GHz
939      3400+      2200MHz      512K      800MHz 
939      3500+      2200MHz      512K      1GHz 
939      3800+      2400MHz      512K      1GHz 
939      4000+      2400MHz      1MB       1GHz 

AMD is getting just as confusing as Intel's new naming scheme!
Last edited by Apoptosis on Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Back Woods Of MO.

Post by Bio-Hazard » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:41 am

I'm trying to keep things straight................. :shock:

User avatar
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2841
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:40 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Post by infinitevalence » Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:00 am

your forgetting two very important variables, price, and overclockablity. Thoses are the two things i look for first then i worry about all that other stuff. A hammer is a hammer, while more cache is a good thing its been shown that the amount of cache on the hammer accounts for very little difference except in some applications.
"Don't open that! It's an alien planet! Is there air? You don't know!"

eric m.
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: dana point, ca

Post by eric m. » Wed Oct 06, 2004 3:04 pm

i think there is a formula. it is something like this:

------ X overclockability = y

where y=actual worth.

um..ok that formula sucks, but the bottom line is that the new numbers for both companies mean pretty much nothing. there are some processors and series of processors that OC better than others, and the only way to determine this is to do it, or wait for someone to do it and see what works and what doesn't.

this whole getting away from the MHZ battle is weird to me because this is what we all grew up on. also, we use a sequential numbering system and it's just ingrained in our heads. it's like horsepower. what if car companies started giving random numbers to tell how powerful an engine was. it would totally suck.
P4C800-E dlx â–‘ 3.2e @4ghz â–‘ 9600XT â–‘ 510 deluxe PSU â–‘ danger den â–‘ hyperX

Post Reply