Page 1 of 1
					
				Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:16 am
				by Skippman
				Which do you guys prefer? I know barb fittings are much cheaper but I don't like the look of the hose clamps used to keep them tight. Has anyone tried the compression fittings? How do you like them?
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:22 am
				by skier
				[insert non-knowledge/opinion]
can't say i really know, but i do know compression fittings are used primarily for Fuel lines in cars(or look it anyway), so i imagine they seal very well, and appear to take up a smaller amount of space, and i've only used barb on Pool stuff and other misc. stuff, but it's generally a pain compared to compression
[/opinion]
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:52 am
				by bubba
				I have used both, and the next time I revamp my loop it will have compression fittings and quality tubing.
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:35 pm
				by Skippman
				On my next rig I'm looking to try and push my modding skills to thier max. With Warmachine I got overcome with the desire to "get it done" and finish it as opposed to really taking my time and getting all the details dialed in. A lot of this was due to my own inexperience with water cooling. Now that I have a rig under my belt I want to really see how... well, beutiful, I can make the system. 
That's my reason for wanting to use the compression fittings. The barb fittings just look so low rent, like something you'd find under the hood of a Ford Fiesta. I want something that looks percision. Compression fittings seem to give that look. My only concern is function. If they look good but leak then they're useless.
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:48 pm
				by XstollieX
				Perhaps using the compression fitting along with a sealant may be the best option.  Maybe some sort of silicone or something along those lines.  I do agree about how the hose clamps look, but I am willing to settle on the look of them to protect 1000's in hardware
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:06 pm
				by DMB2000uk
				I'll be running compression fittings on my next loop (already had a play about with them as I've got some here ready).
They're definitely tight enough to not have to worry about using a second means of sealing them, the only possible concern might be if you over-tighten them and they start cutting through the walls of the tubing, but tightening by hand shouldn't let you tighten that far tbh.
And I have to agree, they do look miles better than the clamps.
Dan
			 
			
					
				Re: Barb vs Compression fittings
				Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:03 pm
				by bubba
				I have used compression fittings on the 760i kit I have and the Koolance block I tested on the Q6600. Its LOADS easier. They just cost more then barbed fittings. 
There are some that run 7/16" ID hose on 1/2" "fat boy" type barbs and not needing clamps, but I'm not that brave.