Zertz wrote:Someone posted the contest on RedFlagDeals, expect some (actually, many) Canadian entries to come in!
YAY
Zertz wrote:Someone posted the contest on RedFlagDeals, expect some (actually, many) Canadian entries to come in!
THAT'S FUNNY!!Vinushka570 wrote: boosh
I seriously dont understand why people choose to use images not their own in their design yaknow?Manduh wrote:THAT'S FUNNY!!Vinushka570 wrote: boosh
I don't understand it either. It's more likely that people don't really have a grasp how serious copyright issues are. Being an artist myself, it really bothers me how flippant people are of copyright laws.Vinushka570 wrote:I seriously dont understand why people choose to use images not their own in their design yaknow?
Hey Carl, nice job. You painted that church scene yourself? Great work.Carlos_will wrote:And just for heads up, the image of the church is my own, you can view this here:
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/811/ch ... ingcom.jpg
Thanks,
Carl.
Thank you ColourDood! Yeah I did, thanks again for your compliments.ColourDood wrote:Hey Carl, nice job. You painted that church scene yourself? Great work.Carlos_will wrote:And just for heads up, the image of the church is my own, you can view this here:
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/811/ch ... ingcom.jpg
Thanks,
Carl.
So that's your image? Seems as though a lot of other people would claim that as well.puma99dk| wrote:here is my try ^^
Please re-work your design so it does not include another copyrighted imagepuma99dk| wrote:here is my try ^^
Not at all, the dragon is the older original design ATI used so most people want to for some reason use it again. This bypasses originality in almost every way.Manduh wrote:ssssssooooooooooooooo many dragons!!
Kind of getting boring to look at the new entries.
Jeesh, people either using material they do not have the rights to or that dragon. Something tells me that if they really wanted to see some creativity with their dragon they could have just copy and pasted it like everyone else.
(ok so maybe that comment was a little snarky)
Vinushka570 wrote:Not at all, the dragon is the older original design ATI used so most people want to for some reason use it again. This bypasses originality in almost every way.Manduh wrote:ssssssooooooooooooooo many dragons!!
Kind of getting boring to look at the new entries.
Jeesh, people either using material they do not have the rights to or that dragon. Something tells me that if they really wanted to see some creativity with their dragon they could have just copy and pasted it like everyone else.
(ok so maybe that comment was a little snarky)
You basically hit the nail on the head