Real world 7800gtx use
Real world 7800gtx use
NO benchmarks, just me playing Doom 3.
Asus a8n-sli deluxe: Two Evga 7800gtx cards-AMD FX-55[stock speed]
2 gigs Crucial Memory:Sony GDM-520 @ 85 refresh rate. Game @ 1600x 1200 all eye candy on FULL. AA at 8 or 16 and I can notice choppy game play. 4 or less, no problem. With the older 6800gt, I couldn't use any AA or I would have choppy game play. Doom 3 seems to put these cards to the test.
Put about 18 total hours of game play at different settings to find out what works best for me and my current set up.
Overall impressions: I like the new cards a lot, just not sure yet if the cost of them justifies the gained performance.
Asus a8n-sli deluxe: Two Evga 7800gtx cards-AMD FX-55[stock speed]
2 gigs Crucial Memory:Sony GDM-520 @ 85 refresh rate. Game @ 1600x 1200 all eye candy on FULL. AA at 8 or 16 and I can notice choppy game play. 4 or less, no problem. With the older 6800gt, I couldn't use any AA or I would have choppy game play. Doom 3 seems to put these cards to the test.
Put about 18 total hours of game play at different settings to find out what works best for me and my current set up.
Overall impressions: I like the new cards a lot, just not sure yet if the cost of them justifies the gained performance.
Mighty fine disguise, what without any increase in power consumption, and proper support for gaming at 2048x1536. ;)SlipSand wrote:Dont worry ATI is working on X900. The 7800 is just a 6800 chip in disguise.
ATI crossfire soon boys.
I don't think that ATI will be able to regain the dominance it had with the 9x00 line anytime soon.
Lmao thats like saying they havent improoved the Ford Musting over the years. You can do anything to make it look and run better with technology.Zelig wrote:Mighty fine disguise, what without any increase in power consumption, and proper support for gaming at 2048x1536. ;)SlipSand wrote:Dont worry ATI is working on X900. The 7800 is just a 6800 chip in disguise.
ATI crossfire soon boys.
I don't think that ATI will be able to regain the dominance it had with the 9x00 line anytime soon.


- infinitevalence
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:40 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
I still like the AA and AF on the ATI cards better. I was just at my friends house and he has his settings turned up higher than mine and my ATI X800XL still looks better than his 6800 Ultra. So i am also waiting for ATI to respond.
"Don't open that! It's an alien planet! Is there air? You don't know!"
- gvblake22
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:39 am
- Location: Northern Michigan
- Contact:
How is the 7800 a 6800 in disguise?! It seems to me to be a completely different animal! And a much better animal at that.SlipSand wrote:Dont worry ATI is working on X900. The 7800 is just a 6800 chip in disguise.
ATI crossfire soon boys.
The 6800Ultra has speeds of 1.1Ghz memory and 400 on the core while the 7800GTX runs just slightly higher at 1.2Ghz memory and 430mhz core yet performs MUCH better than the 6800 Ultra. The 7800 also has more pipelines (24 as opposed to only 16 on the 6800U) so that will also add to the performance difference. And despite all that, the 7800GTX actually uses less power than the 6800U!
Most people figure it's so they have something good in reserve (full 32 pipeline card) for when ATI releases R520.SlipSand wrote:Different board. Same kind of core. Its all based on limits of it. Think about it since when did nVidia make a top of the line card w/o Ultra? Reason is because its a repeat but they found out how to pull in more money with a little more.
Probably using rivatuner, google "6800", "pipelines" and "softmod" for some good results.SlipSand wrote:How do you do that?!