Page 1 of 1
Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:49 am
by HONkUS
According to
Fudzilla and
Bright Side of News
3.0 billion transistors
40nm TSMC
384-bit memory interface
512 shader cores [renamed into CUDA Cores]
32 CUDA cores per Shader Cluster
1MB L1 cache memory [divided into 16KB Cache - Shared Memory]
768KB L2 unified cache memory
Up to 6GB GDDR5 memory
Half Speed IEEE 754 Double Precision
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:25 am
by stopthekilling77
About time the stepped up to faster onboard memory. Gotta wonder if they'll start being able to crank out the eye candy like ATI has been able to.
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:27 am
by InspectahACE
very nice....gonna be a nice end of the year...
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:46 pm
by SAMSAMHA
never fully trust these leaked specs. They can change quite a lot when the product is released. I think NVIDIA sure is watching what AMD has done with the 5870 and has something up in its sleeve to fight it. Howver, can it get enough performance gain to take over the market is another sotry.
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:14 pm
by HONkUS
yeah the only reason I think these might be real is because the Nvidia GPU Conference starts today.
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:27 am
by gibbersome
SAMSAMHA wrote:never fully trust these leaked specs. They can change quite a lot when the product is released. I think NVIDIA sure is watching what AMD has done with the 5870 and has something up in its sleeve to fight it. Howver, can it get enough performance gain to take over the market is another sotry.
I completely agree SAMSAMHA (nice nick btw). Nvidia has not really given any definitive information.
Right now it looks like their new GPU can do everything and wash your dishes. Going to wait for some solid benchmarks before getting excited.
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:15 am
by skier
these ARE the specs...of their new CUDA-based Tesla card, not GT300..i think, nate still hasnt replied with an answer
http://legitreviews.com/article/1100/1/
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:18 am
by gibbersome
That being said NVIDIA also stated that it would be faster than what ATI launched last week. They would be referring to the ATI Radeon HD 5870 graphics card for those that haven't been keeping up on their news. NVIDIA didn't give a launch date other than saying it would be released on an upcoming Tuesday.
So I guess the release isn't too far away, plus Nvidia believes that their 300 series card will trounce the 5800 series, but haven't said how much of a performance gain we'll see.
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:19 pm
by skier
i think it'll be out no earlier than Q1 2010 based on what we saw of the
Fermi Fiasco
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:32 pm
by InspectahACE
skier wrote:i think it'll be out no earlier than Q1 2010 based on what we saw of the
Fermi Fiasco
I looked at the very bottom image of that site for good amount of time with my pops last night....and the more we looked, the more we saw that photoshop was used to the extreme..for all we know..what nvidia showed was probably real..but only time will tell..
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:40 pm
by skier
InspectahACE wrote:skier wrote:i think it'll be out no earlier than Q1 2010 based on what we saw of the
Fermi Fiasco
I looked at the very bottom image of that site for good amount of time with my pops last night....and the more we looked, the more we saw that photoshop was used to the extreme..for all we know..what nvidia showed was probably real..but only time will tell..
but Nate's
post has all the same pictures, with all the same flaws plainly seen, unless he shopped them as well under that logic
Re: Supposed Leaked GT300 specs
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:44 pm
by InspectahACE
damn..i didnt see that in Nate's pics..just saw what Semi-Accurate had...my apologies for that..