Legit Reviews

The GIGABYTE nVidia GeForce 8600GTS 256MB isn't out yet, but you can buy it at E-Wiz right now for $196.98!!

Here is the link: http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=GA-86_256M#

Mfr Part Number: GV-NX86S256H-B
Chipset: GeForce 8600 GTS
Engine Clock: 675 MHz
Video Memory: 256MB DDR3
Memory Clock: 2 GHz
Memory Interface: 128-bit
Bus: PCI-Express x16
RAMDAC: 400 MHz
Connectors: Dual DVI (Support Dual VGA); TV-out (HDTV ready)
Thermal: Fanless
nVidia SLI Technology support
Support HDCP - High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection
Microsoft DirectX 10.0, Shader Model 4.0 and OpenGL 2.0 support
Package: Retail

that heatsink looks like you cant put anything else in any other slots, cheap though(for DX10)

id be affraid of slicing my fingers off installing that thing, its pretty gnarly looking.

Also does anyone know when the NDA lifts for these new NV parts? Im anxious to see some benchmarks.

Cooooolllllll but I don't think that cooler is good enought for this

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4875

Just a small dought??????

Why did nvidia had the lame idea of changing the Memory Interface: 256-bit to just 128-bit

that's a majour BUT in performance... or I'm rong?

Same clock speed as my 7600gt... though mine could never be used as a weapon in a horror movie

vicaphit wrote:Same clock speed as my 7600gt... though mine could never be used as a weapon in a horror movie

LOL

That heatsink is scary indeed...

A nice card
too bad about the 128Bit cut down

I am still hoping their will be the 8600Ultra with the 256-bit controller but its high doubtful.

werty316 wrote:I am still hoping their will be the 8600Ultra with the 256-bit controller but its high doubtful.

Maybe it will be something like 8800GS or such

Ok, I've read the first ATI vs Nvidia 8600 GTS F2F and.... ATI won... Even the "oldie" 7900GS is faster than the new 128bit 8600

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=636&p=1

they raised the price up to $204.99 now.... hehe bastards!

don't forget our much more detailed review of the card here: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/486/1/

Very good article

but I also read another one where the OS was Vista x64 and there the SOAG 8600 didn't hade the same dificulty to beat X1950Pro, not by much, (in some games)... but in the end, counts made, X1950Pro was best... of course that this is a DX9 card but there aren't many games using DX10 now a days... so in my opinion is best to have a good and less $$$ DX9 card (or double in SLI or CF) then a less good DX10 and more $$$ card...
Keep up with the reviews...

Ok, I've read the first ATI vs Nvidia 8600 GTS F2F and.... ATI won... Gives thy a finger Even the "oldie" 7900GS is faster than the new Lame 128bit 8600

correct me if im wrong but isnt comparing the 8600GTS to the 7900GS kind of not fair? As ive read it the 8600 GTS is supposed to be a notch above the 8600GT which is supposed to replace the 7600GT. The 7900GS is a whole different animal. Also id like to think ATI's current best offering could beat the new mid range NV offering, if it couldn't then AMD would be in bigger trouble then I thought! lol. BTW im referring to the legionhardware.com article not Nate's succulent morsel for our Techie palettes that is the 8600 article.

The 8600 chips are to expensive, i reader put 50$more and buy a 8800GTS with 320MB than an 8600GTS.

hey thats what i am thinking, i think you can find 8800 320mb on newegg with rebates for under $250. seems like that would be the way to go if you must have dx10.