Page 1 of 1

SL726 or SL6S5

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:31 pm
by Gizmotech
what is the difference between the 2 processor and which ones better. Also can I use either to replace my existing toshiba laptop processor

Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor - M 2.0 GHz
Front Side Bus : 400 MHz
1st level cache : 12 KB
2nd level cache : 512 KB
core voltage (AC) : 1.3 V
co-processor : integrated in processor
system bus : PCI

Any help much appreciated.

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:57 pm
by Apoptosis
This is what is going on here...

The two sSpec numbers you gave me is when Intel moved from a 533FSB to an 800FSB processor. The original 3.06 processor was based on the C1 core and when the new 800MHz FSB revision came the Northwood processors changed over to the D1 cores. The SL726 is based off the newer 800MHz FSB northwood D1 core and should be a better overclocker due to this. If I had to pick between the C1 and D1 cores I would pick the D1 core.

The SL6S5 is an Intel Pentium 4 C1 Core Desktop Processor:

sSpec Number: SL6S5
Processor Frequency: 3.06 GHz
CPUID String: 0F27h
Package Type: 478 pin PPGA FC-PGA2
Bus Speed: 533 MHz
Thermal Guideline: 81.8W
Core Stepping: C1
Thermal Spec: 69°C
L2 Cache Size: 512 KB
Manufacturing Technology: 0.13 micron

The SL726 is an Intel Pentium 4 D1 Core Desktop Processor:

sSpec Number SL726
Processor Frequency 3.06 GHz
CPUID String 0F29h
Package Type 478 pin PPGA
Core Voltage 1.300
Bus Speed 533 MHz
Thermal Guideline: 70W
Core Stepping: D1
Thermal Spec: 100°C
L2 Cache Size: 512 KB
Manufacturing Technology: 0.13 micron

As far as the notebook processor you own, it would be the Pentium M socket 479 processor. The Socket 479 mobile processor does not have the correct alignment of pins to allow a desktop 478 pin part to fit. So the Pentium 4 3.06 will not be able to work in your toshiba laptop.

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:55 pm
by Gizmotech
thanks for your reply. I thought both of those processors were mobile. Also i have used CPU-Z and that tells me my package is mPGA-478B. Does that not mean I have a 478 socket?

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:38 pm
by Apoptosis
you indeed have a socket 478, which is a desktop socket. Pentium M mobile processors have 479 pins which is a whole different socket.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:59 am
by Gizmotech
This is the dump from cpu-z:

----------------------
CPU-Z version 1.29
----------------------

CPUID Output
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of CPUs 1
APIC ID 0
Name Intel Pentium 4-M
Code name Northwood
Specification Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.00GHz
Family/Model/Stepping F27
Extended Family/Model 0/0
Brand ID 14
Package mPGA-478B
Core Stepping C1
Technology 0.13µ
Instructions Sets MMX, SSE, SSE2
Clock Speed 1993.5 MHz
Clock multiplier x20.0
Front Side Bus Frequency 99.7 MHz
Bus Speed 398.7 MHz
Stock frequency 2000 MHz
L1 Data Cache 8 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L1 Trace Cache 12 Kµops, 8-way set associative
L2 Cache 512 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L2 Speed 1993.5 MHz (Full)
L2 Location On Chip
L2 Data Prefetch Logic yes
L2 Bus Width 256 bits

Does that not mean that I have a mobile processor - the M after pentium 4?? I'm really confused if mines is a mobile or desktop as the sticker on my laptop also has a m above pentium 4. I thought it would have a D above pentium 4 if it was a desktop processor??

Will i be able to replace either of the above 2 processor with my existing one now i have produce the processor spec dump?

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:15 am
by Apoptosis
okay my bad... I made a mistake when reading your post...

The Pentium 4-M is a 478 pin PPGA FC-PGA2 processor that has a 400MHz FSB and ranges from 1.40 to 2.60 GHz.

The Pentium M is a 479 pin Micro FCPGA & FCBGA processor that has a 533MHz FSB and ranges from 1.5 to 2.13GHz.

I missed the 4 on the original post... sorry bout that.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:32 am
by Gizmotech
So does that mean i can put either of the processors in then?? Is one better that the other. Ive been told the SL6S5 is hyperthreading and the SL726 is speed step technology. Is Hyperthreading better than Speed Step.

Thanks in advance.

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:52 am
by Gizmotech
Hi there, can anyone tell me if the processor below will work on my machine?

Mobile prescott processor

Specifications

Manufacturer Intel
Type Mobile Pentium 4 (Prescott, 90 nm)
Model SL7NA
Clock Speed 3.06 GHz
Front Bus Speed 533 MHz
Cache 1024 kB
Hyper Threading Supported
Socket 478 pin PPGA
Stepping core E0


My machine
CPUID Output
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of CPUs 1
APIC ID 0
Name Intel Pentium 4-M
Code name Northwood
Specification Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.00GHz
Family/Model/Stepping F27
Extended Family/Model 0/0
Brand ID 14
Package mPGA-478B
Core Stepping C1
Technology 0.13µ
Instructions Sets MMX, SSE, SSE2
Clock Speed 1993.5 MHz
Clock multiplier x20.0
Front Side Bus Frequency 99.7 MHz
Bus Speed 398.7 MHz
Stock frequency 2000 MHz
L1 Data Cache 8 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L1 Trace Cache 12 Kµops, 8-way set associative
L2 Cache 512 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L2 Speed 1993.5 MHz (Full)
L2 Location On Chip
L2 Data Prefetch Logic yes
L2 Bus Width 256 bits

Re: SL726 or SL6S5

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:39 am
by Maseo
SL726 or SL6S5 ???

I researched the two but missed one important aspect witch is the Clock Multiplier.

I purchased the SL726 for my board and found that it can't go any faster than 1.6 GHz because its core multilplier is fixed at 12 as opposed to the SL6S5 wich is 23.

I've always wanted to build my own computer and now that I did, found that there's so many different (minor but significant) versions of the same processor.

Here's a good link:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx

Re: SL726 or SL6S5

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:48 am
by Illuminati
LOL.... not sure, but I think you were a little late on your reply! (Note date of prior post).

Anyhow, welcome to the forums!

Re: SL726 or SL6S5

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:53 pm
by Zertz
Illuminati wrote:LOL.... not sure, but I think you were a little late on your reply! (Note date of prior post).

Anyhow, welcome to the forums!
Bleh, not even 2 years :P