bad benchmarks.....I think

Forum for all the AMD (Previously ATI) video cards from the past, present and future!
Post Reply
hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Thu May 21, 2009 6:01 pm

I got my 4870 yesterday and had a few problems and yet to find out if it's card or motherboard. Well today maybe the icing on the cake... I've did a few benchmarks including 3dmark06 and the results seemed awesome! VERY good in my opinion. Until I noticed that graph at the top, saying your system <<<<<< similar systems>>>>>> I was the very slowest benchmark with my set up. My scores are 13866 for the 3dmark06. Also I have no idea what's going on in the loading screens the screen is really blurry. What's going on....?

User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by skier » Sat May 23, 2009 7:57 pm

well, my 9600GSO alone gets me 11,400 marks.. 15k when i have the second in SLI
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Sat May 23, 2009 8:01 pm

still confused on what's going on with it.

User avatar
XstollieX
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:51 am
Contact:

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by XstollieX » Sat May 23, 2009 9:55 pm

3dmark06 relies on the cpu for a good portion of the score. When overclocking and running benchmarks the gpu scores will go up with out clocking the gfx card anymore. 3dvantage doesn't seem to have the same reliance on the cpu speed for the gpu scores. Ill post the different scores up in a few minutes with my I7 rig. One will be oc'd one won't take a look at the gpu scores.
test oc2.jpg
this is all default settings
test oc2.jpg (23.63 KiB) Viewed 1407 times
take a look at the sm2.0 and the hdr/sm3.0 scores.
test oc.jpg
this is overclocked
test oc.jpg (23.67 KiB) Viewed 1401 times
Looking at the scores above you can see that the bump in the cpu speed brought the graphics cards up quite a bit. None of the settings on my graphics cards where adjusted (aside from the speed of the fan). If I had to guess, your cpu is bottlenecking your card.

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Sun May 24, 2009 12:33 am

ok that makes sense I just figured it would be a GPU dependent program for the most part.

User avatar
XstollieX
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:51 am
Contact:

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by XstollieX » Sun May 24, 2009 7:13 am

Glad I could help

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Mon May 25, 2009 8:25 am

STILL waiting for my new motherboard to overclock a bit more. But, as of now, I looked up a combo with the e5200 and the 4870 and the benchmarks are about the same... :-(. Only good news out of it is when it's overclocked. Like the one I saw where the guy had it at 4.0GHz the benchmark score went from 11k stock to 18k... Pretty weird for a GPU program to be so CPU dependent...

User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by skier » Wed May 27, 2009 12:43 pm

well i'm sure the 4870 isnt being taken advantage of at all with a slower/weaker CPU, so once the processor has more raw power, it balances out the system more
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Wed May 27, 2009 3:32 pm

I got it today, I can only go up to 3.25 because of heat. I threw it up to 3.85 at 1.45vcore and it was stable and I shut it off after 30 seconds of occt. It got to 75C and I was like SHUT OFF!! I'll have a new cooler friday or saturday. Water maybe.

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Wed May 27, 2009 5:04 pm

The scores are rising, I ran 3dMark with the stock cooler @ 60C max.
Image

User avatar
IRQ Conflict
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:26 pm

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by IRQ Conflict » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:14 am

Yes, 3dmark is a joke. 06 is a CPU benchmark and Vantage is a physics benchmark. GPU? Wassat? :lol:
-Rampage- Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula CPU: Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz Cooling: OCZ Vendetta 2 Ram: 4GB OCZ Reaper HPC PC2-8500 5-5-5-15 @ 540Mhz Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 Storage: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB/4x 500GB Barracuda 7200.11 Raid 0 Power Supply: PC P&C Silencer 750 Quad Case: Antec P180B Monitor: Syncmaster 245T OS: Vista 64bit
Image

hercules71185
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am

Re: bad benchmarks.....I think

Post by hercules71185 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:50 pm

I guess nothing beats actual game benchmarks huh. I got my score up to 16k so it's better I was just thrown off that the score was so low compared to the other pcs in the type.

Post Reply