Can not use 2008 Server on Intel based desktop Motherboards?
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:00 pm
I have been told by ASUS tech support that all the recent Intel and nVidia chipsets will refuse to run a server OS on a desktop motherboard but AMD did not [at least not yet] restrict this. If true, this is really crappy of Intel and I will be finally switching to AMD processors.
Can anyone verify this for other mobo makers using Intel chipsets? It is at minimum true of actual Intel mobos as I have read exactly that on their website though they claimed it was a lack of drivers rather than flat out blocking which is what the ASUS guy told me they now do.
I would appreciate any good motherboard suggestions for building an "HTPC 2008 server". It will sit in my wire closet anyway so I want good 5.1 audio to my A/V receiver and video to my Sony HDTV as well as run 2008 Server with Hyper-V for my development and testing work. Hopefully IE7 running Silverlight for Netflix and Winamp run well on 2008 Server.
Also, I'm far from an expert at audio or video so I need advice on 1) for decent 5.1 audio, is the now normally builtin audio in the latest motherboards sufficient if I'm just going to route it to my A/V receiver with S/PDIF optical cable or are audio cards really worthwhile in this case even if not running speakers directly from the PC? and 2) will I get better video on my Sony 1080i HDTV using HDMI output from the mobo or a graphics card vs. using an analog D-Sub connection that will display the native 1366x768 resolution of the TV which is what I am doing on my current system. Sony support says the later is better even if analog and others claim the former would be better. One thing I don't like about HDMI is the audio apparently cannot be split out in the A/V receiver and would have to go to the TV and then back to the receiver. I know it is 7.1 capable but don't need but 5.1 so optical is fine for me if lostless but I want the best video I can get to a 1080i TV that has a 1366x768 native resolution. I have verified that my current XP system displays at this resolution using a Radeon card to the D-Sub connector.
Any advice and experience most welcome!
Thanks, Dave
Can anyone verify this for other mobo makers using Intel chipsets? It is at minimum true of actual Intel mobos as I have read exactly that on their website though they claimed it was a lack of drivers rather than flat out blocking which is what the ASUS guy told me they now do.
I would appreciate any good motherboard suggestions for building an "HTPC 2008 server". It will sit in my wire closet anyway so I want good 5.1 audio to my A/V receiver and video to my Sony HDTV as well as run 2008 Server with Hyper-V for my development and testing work. Hopefully IE7 running Silverlight for Netflix and Winamp run well on 2008 Server.
Also, I'm far from an expert at audio or video so I need advice on 1) for decent 5.1 audio, is the now normally builtin audio in the latest motherboards sufficient if I'm just going to route it to my A/V receiver with S/PDIF optical cable or are audio cards really worthwhile in this case even if not running speakers directly from the PC? and 2) will I get better video on my Sony 1080i HDTV using HDMI output from the mobo or a graphics card vs. using an analog D-Sub connection that will display the native 1366x768 resolution of the TV which is what I am doing on my current system. Sony support says the later is better even if analog and others claim the former would be better. One thing I don't like about HDMI is the audio apparently cannot be split out in the A/V receiver and would have to go to the TV and then back to the receiver. I know it is 7.1 capable but don't need but 5.1 so optical is fine for me if lostless but I want the best video I can get to a 1080i TV that has a 1366x768 native resolution. I have verified that my current XP system displays at this resolution using a Radeon card to the D-Sub connector.
Any advice and experience most welcome!
Thanks, Dave