Page 1 of 1

3 Issues with D975XBX2

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:33 pm
by jfh60
Antec P150 with 430 watt PS
Intel D975XBX2 (2634 BIOS)
Intel 6600 Process
2 Gig OCZ Mem
NEC 90GX2 Monitor
ATI 1600X Pro Video
Creative X-FI Xtreme Music Audio
WD 250 Sata drive (using IDE)
WD 80 IDE
Plextor IDE DVD/CD
Sony Floppy

Issue 1:
I have the WD 250 Sata as my primary boot drive. I wanted to add the WD 80 as the Primary Ide and the Plextor as the slave. The sytem would not boot (drive order correct). I switched the Plextor to primary and WD 80 to secondary without problem.

Isssue 2:
I disabled the EIST in the Bios. When I run CPU-Z my processor multiplier and CPU speed changes from 6 times to 9 times and back every couple of seconds.

Issue 3:
I cannot the get the system to post with anything over 267. The only performance Bios change I have made was to the OCZ 800mhz memory (4-4-4-15 and 2.20 v) which works fine at stock processor speed.

All suggestions welcome.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:44 am
by IRQ Conflict
Only 3 issues? Lucky fella! :lol:

Issue 1: BIOS seems to have serious detection issues on multiple fronts :evil:

Isssue 2: see Issue 3: below


Isssue 3: Enter Maintenance mode and disable 'watchdog' ?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:48 am
by ShaneS
Jf, check my post here about the same topic.

What revision cpu do you have?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:20 pm
by jfh60
Intel Box
Version - D63625-002
Pack Date - 09/12/2006

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:37 pm
by ShaneS
jfh60 wrote:Intel Box
Version - D63625-002
Pack Date - 09/12/2006
Interesting, here's mine..

Version: D63625-002
Pack Date: 11/16/06


Could this be a version issue?

Hmm....

Did any of things mentioned in this thread or mine help you out at all?

Besides running rmclock (and disabling C1E within it), nothing else seems to work (for me anyways). Unfortunately, doing this in rmclock isn't permanent and has to be re-done whenever you reboot.

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 pm
by jfh60
I re-installed Bios 2507 today and am going to accept things the way they are. I have been satisfied with the board since my initial problem was resolved with a memory voltage boost. I was currently thinking of a 2.6 or 2.8 O/C at most. The system is serving its purpose at the the stock 2.4 setting and thats the way I am going to leave it. The issues that I mentioned are only minor problems for me.

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:20 am
by ShaneS
jfh60 wrote:I re-installed Bios 2507 today and am going to accept things the way they are. I have been satisfied with the board since my initial problem was resolved with a memory voltage boost. I was currently thinking of a 2.6 or 2.8 O/C at most. The system is serving its purpose at the the stock 2.4 setting and thats the way I am going to leave it. The issues that I mentioned are only minor problems for me.
Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing.

None of the games I have been playing seem to be adversely affected by this at all, so I'm not sure it really matters.