Hi,
I was looking at this Dell Vostro 1200 laptop with the processors being:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Pro T7250 with No Camera & Standard Palmrest (2.0GHz, 2MB Cache, 800 MHz FSB)
Isn't 2MB bit small cache? And 2.0GHz very small speed by today's standard?
Information Regarding Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Pro T7250
-
- Legit Little One
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:41 pm
Re: Information Regarding Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Pro T7250
it's actually slightly above average(not much of course) for a laptop, mine is a T5750(2GHz, 2MB Cache and 667MHz FSB) and is better than many out there, it's no alienware, but its a solid laptopTaepdong1101 wrote:Hi,
I was looking at this Dell Vostro 1200 laptop with the processors being:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Pro T7250 with No Camera & Standard Palmrest (2.0GHz, 2MB Cache, 800 MHz FSB)
Isn't 2MB bit small cache? And 2.0GHz very small speed by today's standard?
it all depends what you want to use the laptop for...
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
Re: Information Regarding Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Pro T7250
You have to also consider the form factor of the laptop.
The faster/larger cache chips generate more heat and use more power, and in a small laptop, it doesn't have the battery capacity to be useful with a power hungry CPU, and it doesn't have enough space to have a large CPU cooler (to stop the CPU cooking itself/the laptop).
So the bottom line is, all laptops have to compromise on something, and in this case it's not top end specced so it can fit in the form factor.
Dan
The faster/larger cache chips generate more heat and use more power, and in a small laptop, it doesn't have the battery capacity to be useful with a power hungry CPU, and it doesn't have enough space to have a large CPU cooler (to stop the CPU cooking itself/the laptop).
So the bottom line is, all laptops have to compromise on something, and in this case it's not top end specced so it can fit in the form factor.
Dan