SU9300 VS T7600

Discussion about Intel CPUs and overclocking. Need help with that new Intel processor? Not sure which one is right for you? Like to void your warranty? This is the place for you! Please keep the topic on Intel Processors!
Post Reply
teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:59 am

SU9300 VS T7600?

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by Apoptosis » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:37 pm

What about the two mobile processors are you wanting to know?
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!

teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:51 pm

Which will yeild greater performance? I am trying to compare a T7600 in a TC4400 with 2gb of ram, or a SU9300 in a 2730p with 2gb ram

teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:54 pm

I have a TC4400 with an 80gb hd, a T7600, 2gb ram... And I had issues, so HP offered give me a 2730p with the SU9300, 120gb hd, 2gb ram, webcam, etc... They claim its a major step up, but the processor differnce has me hungup.

teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:57 pm

Also, it is a refurb. How nice are HP refurbs?

User avatar
dicecca112
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5013
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:40 am
Contact:

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by dicecca112 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:59 pm

Depends on what apps you use. The main difference I see is Cache, CPU speed, Socket and Bus Speed. The T7600 looks like last gen, and the SU9300 looks never.
Image

teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:36 pm

Well, I observed that the cache was half of the T7600, and that the clock was way lower too, but I didn't know if anyone knew if there was a different in the archetecture that would make it run any better to compensate for the difference in specs. I KNOW it depends on usage, but i mean, i want to know the different in processing power.

User avatar
dicecca112
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5013
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:40 am
Contact:

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by dicecca112 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:38 pm

Like I said it depends on the program, not all programs take advantage of the cache and bus speed. If your just surfing the web, and less intensive applications, then go for whatever is cheaper.
Image

teckkid11
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:53 am

Re: SU9300 VS T7600

Post by teckkid11 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:49 pm

Which would benchmark better? And by how much.

Post Reply