Page 1 of 1
SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:59 am
by teckkid11
SU9300 VS T7600?
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:37 pm
by Apoptosis
What about the two mobile processors are you wanting to know?
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:51 pm
by teckkid11
Which will yeild greater performance? I am trying to compare a T7600 in a TC4400 with 2gb of ram, or a SU9300 in a 2730p with 2gb ram
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:54 pm
by teckkid11
I have a TC4400 with an 80gb hd, a T7600, 2gb ram... And I had issues, so HP offered give me a 2730p with the SU9300, 120gb hd, 2gb ram, webcam, etc... They claim its a major step up, but the processor differnce has me hungup.
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:57 pm
by teckkid11
Also, it is a refurb. How nice are HP refurbs?
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:59 pm
by dicecca112
Depends on what apps you use. The main difference I see is Cache, CPU speed, Socket and Bus Speed. The T7600 looks like last gen, and the SU9300 looks never.
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:36 pm
by teckkid11
Well, I observed that the cache was half of the T7600, and that the clock was way lower too, but I didn't know if anyone knew if there was a different in the archetecture that would make it run any better to compensate for the difference in specs. I KNOW it depends on usage, but i mean, i want to know the different in processing power.
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:38 pm
by dicecca112
Like I said it depends on the program, not all programs take advantage of the cache and bus speed. If your just surfing the web, and less intensive applications, then go for whatever is cheaper.
Re: SU9300 VS T7600
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:49 pm
by teckkid11
Which would benchmark better? And by how much.