Intel 'Conroe' pricing leaks out

Discussion about Intel CPUs and overclocking. Need help with that new Intel processor? Not sure which one is right for you? Like to void your warranty? This is the place for you! Please keep the topic on Intel Processors!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Intel 'Conroe' pricing leaks out

Post by Apoptosis » Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:01 pm

Intel 'Conroe' pricing leaks out
Freshly leaked Pentium D pricing information has added weight to claims that Intel will ship the next model in the series, the 960, at the end of this month before slashing prices in Q3 when its next-generation architecture 'Conroe' processor debuts.

Pentium D pricing data provided by DailyTech confirms earlier reports that the 960 will cost $533 at launch on 30 April before falling to $316 in Q3 when Conroe launches. Current Pentium D 9xx chips will see their prices cut on 23 April, as expected.

Four Conroe chips will ship initially: the E6300, E6400, E6600 and E6700, following Intel's new processor numbering scheme, introduced when the Core Duo mobile processor family arrived earlier this year. The four dual-core Conroes are clocked at 1.86, 2.13, 2.40 and 2.67GHz, respectively, run on a 1066MHz frontside bus and contain 4MB of cache shared between the two cores.

The CPUs will be priced at $209, $244, $316 and $530, respectively, at launch, the new report claims. At the same time, Intel will debut the VT-less Pentium D 925 at $178. In addition to the 960's price reduction to $316, the 950 will come down to $241 and the 940 to $209. Intel has already indicated it intends to phase out the 930 and 920.
Source

-mogwai
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: st. louis, mo
Contact:

Post by -mogwai » Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:46 pm

that's better than i expected
Image

User avatar
dicecca112
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5013
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:40 am
Contact:

Post by dicecca112 » Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:08 pm

so Intels Dual core come Conroe will be cheaper, run as cool, and have better performance. Hmm, no need to change to AMD this round. Intel has done some good things for us college students with their prices
Image

Black Mesa Scientist
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 7:43 am
Location: Houten, Netherlands

Post by Black Mesa Scientist » Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:08 pm

The best Conroe chip is only freakin 530 bucks???

This is amazing since the FX60 is about a 1000 bucks!~!

Conroe owns the FX60 hard so.... Will we see incredible price drops on the FX series?
Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2300MHZ =3650+ Stock Voltage
eVGA GF6800GS 485/1200.
2x512 Corsair XMS 3200LLPT
AsRock 939-Dualsata2
Sweex 400WATT 18amps
Dual layer DVD-RW
2x80GB seagate Barracuda!!!!



Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberries!

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis » Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:36 pm

I'm sure AMD will align their prices when the "F" series processors come out here shortly.

SAMSAMHA
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:59 am

Post by SAMSAMHA » Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:01 am

quite competitive pricing against amd. I think intel may be better cpu around the same price range.

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis » Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:46 am

I think Intel has their fingers crossed and are thinking what you are ;)

User avatar
infinitevalence
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2841
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:40 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by infinitevalence » Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:42 pm

I dont know how much finger crossnig they are doing. AM2 is a nice socket its going to give use a good 5-10% performance improvement over 939 from the memory bandwidth alone (overclockers that is) but what is not happening is the conversion over to 65nm... AMD just cant get enough production ramped up to make a difference. You wont see anything thats a really good overclocker until maybe 2007 form AMD at best you will just get a speed bump and performance bump.
"Don't open that! It's an alien planet! Is there air? You don't know!"

EvilCloudStrife
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:10 pm
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Contact:

Post by EvilCloudStrife » Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:56 am

are you sure thats the MSRP for us? or is that the pricing for resellers...

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am

that is the pricing when bought in 1000 units... newegg usually sells for under that price

-mogwai
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: st. louis, mo
Contact:

Post by -mogwai » Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:24 am

it's typical, really.... intel does something awesome and then amd tops it.
Image

User avatar
kenc51
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 5167
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Contact:

Post by kenc51 » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:57 am

-mogwai wrote:it's typical, really.... intel does something awesome and then amd tops it.
Not this time!
Mayby in the server market AMD have a chance....but Intel owns AMD this year :)

BBB
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Contact:

Post by BBB » Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:50 am

Please note that these are not the "Official" price lists from Intel. I do think these are accuurate, however.

Jarlax
Legit Enthusiast
Legit Enthusiast
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 8:18 am

Post by Jarlax » Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:33 am

I was looking to AM2 for my next rig but after seeing the early Conroe performance I am all about intel. AM2 does not seem to be able to compete with Conroe at this time.

Post Reply