Core 2 Extreme X6800 benches

Kerii · Post by **Kerii** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:21 pm

Article: http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/x6800vsfx62-1.htm

Skip to the charts: http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/x6800vsfx62-10.htm
Power consumption: http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/x6800vsfx62-11.htm
CrossFire: http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/x6800vsfx62-12.htm

I'm speechless.

Pengwin · Post by **Pengwin** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 pm

yup. supposedly conroe is supposed to be really good

and for all u silence freaks it can run passive w/ the stock heatsink "supposedly"

SAMSAMHA · Post by **SAMSAMHA** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:38 pm

i am waiting for the offical product to launch and reviews.

Fantasma · Post by **Fantasma** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:33 am

It seems it will be a very good processor but will it be 64bit capable?
I ask that because the intel core duo processors aren´t

Immortal · Post by **Immortal** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:41 am

i think its fairly obvious that it is, intel would not make a glaring mistake like that, 64-bit support is the new "must have" thing!

SAMSAMHA · Post by **SAMSAMHA** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:08 pm

the current core duo is not but I think the next gen of cpu (ie the one in the review) is.

Post by **DMB2000uk** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:07 pm

So looking at that site we can expect an ~8% increase (taken from their results over all games tested) for conroe over FX-62.

Sweet. I would love to get that rig and watercool and overclock conroe.

Ive read somewhere that these babies have smashed the 1M Super Pi WR to less than 10 seconds now

Dan

Pengwin · Post by **Pengwin** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:12 pm

conroe is actually more than 8% better than FX-62

2M: 26.921s http://www.geocities.jp/gbxfs134/26_921.jpg
4M: 1m03.562s http://www.geocities.jp/gbxfs134/103562.jpg
8M: 2m28.329s http://www.geocities.jp/gbxfs134/228329.jpg
16M: 5m22.797s http://www.geocities.jp/gbxfs134/5_22_797.jpg
32M: 11m51.797s http://www.geocities.jp/gbxfs134/11_51_797.jpg

there would be super Pi stats

HONkUS · Post by **HONkUS** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:52 pm

Looks like Intel takes the cake this round.

kenc51 · Post by **kenc51** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:55 pm

Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 Overclocking with Air Cooling

Core 2 Extreme X6800 chilled and overclocked with LN2 to 5Ghz!

Bye bye AMD..........

Kerii · Post by **Kerii** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:31 pm

Fantasma wrote:It seems it will be a very good processor but will it be 64bit capable?
I ask that because the intel core duo processors aren´t

Look closely at the CPU-Z screenshot. Says EM64T at the end.

Pengwin · Post by **Pengwin** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:56 pm

conroe hits past 4 Ghz on air cooling (Tuniq Tower 120) with liquid u can surpass 5 ghz

Pengwin · Post by **Pengwin** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:09 pm

http://u-san.net/c-board/file/X6800-5013_10s140.gif

kenc51 · Post by **kenc51** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:13 pm

Pengwin wrote:conroe hits past 4 Ghz on air cooling (Tuniq Tower 120) with liquid u can surpass 5 ghz

That was on LN2 not water!

CPU: Core 2 Extreme X6800 : (2.93G/266x11/FSB 1066/L2 4MB)
M/B: Intel D975XBXLKR-rev302 modded (bios:1073)
CPU Cooling: LN2 (Pro4 + V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.4)
Memory: Corsair PC2-5400UL(v1.3) 512MB x2
VGA: ATI rageXL (PCI)
HDD: IBM DTLA-307020
Power Supply：Zippy-460w
Vcore: 1.74v, Vdimm: 2.55v, Vio: 3.65V
OS: Windows Server 2003
MEM: 4:5, CL4-3-3-2

KUDOS to PRTeamJapan over on XS

Pengwin · Post by **Pengwin** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:16 pm

http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware ... 88251.html

see 4 Ghz on air

about Liquid Nitrogen - good liquid cooling can get u really close maybe 4.7 4.8Ghz