Intel is going to implement 2 new sockets for the next generation Nehalem architecture in 2008 and they are Socket B and Socket H. As we know, Nehalem is 45nm based and we are going to see some exciting changes such as IMC (Integrated Memory Controller) and CSI. Socket B will be LGA1366 and Socket H will be LGA715. The reason why Socket B has so many more contact pads is pretty obvious. It is due to the IMC on the Nehalem CPU. Since there is a Socket H version as well, we can expect there will be another Nehalem based CPUs without IMC.
source: VR Zone
Intel to Have Two New Sockets For Nehalem in 2008
- kenc51
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Contact:
More than just tested! Intel have plenty of working 45nm silicon. They could produce a whole SKU of 45nm based chips if they wanted.Sporg wrote:The 45nm are currently being tested.
45nm "Nehalem" is currently been tested...........and is working AFAIK (just slowly)
Remember Nehalem is a few generations ahead of C2D.
So why do they wait??kenc51 wrote:More than just tested! Intel have plenty of working 45nm silicon. They could produce a whole SKU of 45nm based chips if they wanted.Sporg wrote:The 45nm are currently being tested.
45nm "Nehalem" is currently been tested...........and is working AFAIK (just slowly)
Remember Nehalem is a few generations ahead of C2D.
at least show some samples
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Wait and sell the **** out of what you have and then when the competition has something to compete drop the new **** and blow them back out of the water...
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
yep. it's called economics they not here to do us any good - they are here to make moneyzparker wrote:Wait and sell the **** out of what you have and then when the competition has something to compete drop the new **** and blow them back out of the water...
Main rig: NZXT Phantom modded case with Danger Den WC, Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite, Ryzen 5800X @ stock, 32GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200Mhz 16-18-18-36-1T, AMD RX 5700XT + AlphaCool WC, ACER Nitro XV2 27", SP 1TB nvme PCiE GEN3, Samsung 2TB; Cooler Master MW Gold 650W, Win10 Pro 64
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
oh yeah and i forgot, Robbing us blind in the processsbohdan wrote:yep. it's called economics they not here to do us any good - they are here to make moneyzparker wrote:Wait and sell the **** out of what you have and then when the competition has something to compete drop the new **** and blow them back out of the water...
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet