A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
-
Apoptosis
- Site Admin

- Posts: 33922
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri
-
Contact:
Post
by Apoptosis » Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:16 am
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Processor Performance Review
The AMD Phenom II X6 1055T is the entry level six-core processor in the Phenom II series with its overall clock frequency of 2.8GHz. With a street price of $198 and six cores is the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T CPU worth it? Read on to see how it performs in the benchmarks and to see how it handles being overclocked on our AMD 890FX test system.
Article Title: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Processor Performance Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1414/1/
Pricing At Time of Print: $198 shipped
-
jnanster
- Legit Fanatic

- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:09 am
- Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Post
by jnanster » Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:13 am
Great review and an impressive overclocker toooooo!
As more programs are updated, the six cores are gonna shine.
ga-z77-dh3 (great & cheap O/C'er from Gigabyte)
i2600k/16 gigs Kingson 1600 (OC'ed to 4.5Ghz)
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 + (lapped, smok'in deal, 38C idle, 65C loaded)
MSI GTX 660ti Power Edition
Antec 900 case (quiet)
-
Kaos Kid
- Legit Extremist

- Posts: 960
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:31 am
- Location: 40 clicks West of the Gateway
Post
by Kaos Kid » Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:54 am
ooooh Daddy want!
Not that I need it yet, I haven't found anything that maxes out my 4 cores but dang 6 cores is so cool!
Thanks for the great review. I had heard that the new 6cores weren't that special but now you've made me want one!
I have come to the conclusion that "FaceBook" should be renamed "FacePalm"

-
Sttm
- Legit Extremist

- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:31 pm
- Location: San Jose CA
Post
by Sttm » Fri Sep 17, 2010 3:32 pm
Good review.
Though I think the i5 760 would have been a better Intel chip to compare against.
Core i7 2600k/ ASUS P8Z68-V Z68/ 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 Blue/ EVGA Geforce GTX 560ti Maximum Graphics Edition/Windows 7/Antec 300/Antec 650w/LG Blu Combo/Hp 27inch 2710M/Samsung P2770HD
"I think sharing is overrated...and helping others. And what's all this crap I've been hearing about tolerance?"
-
skier
- Moderator

- Posts: 4450
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
- Location: Maine
-
Contact:
Post
by skier » Fri Sep 17, 2010 4:15 pm
Sttm wrote:Though I think the i5 760 would have been a better Intel chip to compare against.
care to elaborate on that? the 8xx is the closest match to a 6-core, because the 4 extra threads equate to roughly 2 cores (with the exception of applications which only use logical cores), and the 9xx has an unfair advantage because of trip channel Memory. an i5 750+ would be far behind thuban across the board (though it would be sweet to see some comparisons with it given the AMD quads used), in the multi threaded apps anyway
Thuban does better than expected, even surprising me, having a 1055
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
-
iseeman
- Legit Aficionado

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:29 pm
Post
by iseeman » Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:46 pm
Good review and little confusing because tomsh quarterly build showed ii x6 1055t getting owned badly by intel

-
skier
- Moderator

- Posts: 4450
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
- Location: Maine
-
Contact:
Post
by skier » Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:50 pm
iseeman wrote:Good review and little confusing because tom's quarterly build showed the 1055t getting owned badly by intel

well one platform is well over $100 more than the other..
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
-
Sttm
- Legit Extremist

- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:31 pm
- Location: San Jose CA
Post
by Sttm » Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:39 pm
skier wrote:Sttm wrote:Though I think the i5 760 would have been a better Intel chip to compare against.
care to elaborate on that? the 8xx is the closest match to a 6-core, because the 4 extra threads equate to roughly 2 cores (with the exception of applications which only use logical cores), and the 9xx has an unfair advantage because of trip channel Memory. an i5 750+ would be far behind thuban across the board (though it would be sweet to see some comparisons with it given the AMD quads used), in the multi threaded apps anyway
Thuban does better than expected, even surprising me, having a 1055
They cost around the same, and they use the same ram setup.
Core i7 2600k/ ASUS P8Z68-V Z68/ 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 Blue/ EVGA Geforce GTX 560ti Maximum Graphics Edition/Windows 7/Antec 300/Antec 650w/LG Blu Combo/Hp 27inch 2710M/Samsung P2770HD
"I think sharing is overrated...and helping others. And what's all this crap I've been hearing about tolerance?"
-
skier
- Moderator

- Posts: 4450
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
- Location: Maine
-
Contact:
Post
by skier » Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:46 pm
Sttm wrote:skier wrote:Sttm wrote:Though I think the i5 760 would have been a better Intel chip to compare against.
care to elaborate on that? the 8xx is the closest match to a 6-core, because the 4 extra threads equate to roughly 2 cores (with the exception of applications which only use logical cores), and the 9xx has an unfair advantage because of trip channel Memory. an i5 750+ would be far behind thuban across the board (though it would be sweet to see some comparisons with it given the AMD quads used), in the multi threaded apps anyway
Thuban does better than expected, even surprising me, having a 1055
They cost around the same, and they use the same ram setup.
here's a summary if it had the 760: 1055T will win in all multithreaded apps and bandwidth tests, 760 will win single-threaded apps
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
-
trucz
- Legit Enthusiast

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:21 pm
Post
by trucz » Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:53 pm
Does turbo core still kick in if you've overclocked the processor already? eg. 3 cores in use or less at 4.2 GHz automatically goes to 4.7 GHz.
MSI K9A2 CF
AMD X2 2.7GHz
Crucial 2GB DDR2 Ballistix
Seagate 500GB 7200.11
-
skier
- Moderator

- Posts: 4450
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
- Location: Maine
-
Contact:
Post
by skier » Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:07 pm
trucz wrote:Does turbo core still kick in if you've overclocked the processor already? eg. 3 cores in use or less at 4.2 GHz automatically goes to 4.7 GHz.
it can, but you disable it that high unless you're doing a suicide run for max clock, because it causes great instability because it does not appropriately adjust voltage to the 16.5x/16x clock.
i've been at 4.5GHz with mine at 16x, used an app to adjust turbo in windows and set it to the first core only
on its own turbo is not easy to control, if you are at 0-17% utilized then it hops around randomly to 3 or 4 different cores. turbo is something you have to disable for daily use if you overclock
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
-
geokilla
- Moderator

- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:46 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
Post
by geokilla » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:27 pm
4Ghz hex-core for $199... Oh man those folding numbers would be so nice. There's no need to spend extra money on a 1090T BE.
Intel Core i5-3570K @ 4.2Ghz @ 1.16V (CPU-Z + LinX)
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H F14 BIOS
ASUS GTX 460 768MB @ 800/1950
Kingston HyperX DDR3 8GB @ DDR-1333
Corsair AX750
Crucial M4 128GB
Western Digital Black 1TB
Cooler Master Hyper 212+ EVO
BenQ E2420HD
---------------------
I AM CANADIAN!
-
skier
- Moderator

- Posts: 4450
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
- Location: Maine
-
Contact:
Post
by skier » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:52 pm
geokilla wrote:4Ghz hex-core for $199... Oh man those folding numbers would be so nice. There's no need to spend extra money on a 1090T BE.
mine at 3.9GHz is about 9k-13k ppd for SMP2 depending on the unit (credit ranges from 5,600-11,000pts per unit) with one video card folding and taking up 1-6% of the CPU util
-Austin

Screamin' BCLK:

775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
-
INeedAFnSuffix
- Legit Fanatic

- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:25 am
Post
by INeedAFnSuffix » Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:54 am
Hexa-core on the cheap !
Now let's compare it to the i7 985X which is total heap of junked silicon which is actually worth it only at about 400SGD .
This is so friggin cheap , i'm getting me myself a 1055 ( I don't care about locked multipliers , actually )
-
trucz
- Legit Enthusiast

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:21 pm
Post
by trucz » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:24 pm
skier wrote:trucz wrote:Does turbo core still kick in if you've overclocked the processor already? eg. 3 cores in use or less at 4.2 GHz automatically goes to 4.7 GHz.
it can, but you disable it that high unless you're doing a suicide run for max clock, because it causes great instability because it does not appropriately adjust voltage to the 16.5x/16x clock.
i've been at 4.5GHz with mine at 16x, used an app to adjust turbo in windows and set it to the first core only
on its own turbo is not easy to control, if you are at 0-17% utilized then it hops around randomly to 3 or 4 different cores. turbo is something you have to disable for daily use if you overclock
thanks for the answer.
MSI K9A2 CF
AMD X2 2.7GHz
Crucial 2GB DDR2 Ballistix
Seagate 500GB 7200.11
-
rrplay
- Legit Enthusiast

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:59 am
- Location: Crystal Lake.Illinois
Post
by rrplay » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:34 am
This is the best detailed review I have read about these processors as well as the skier's explanation of turbo and the OC in the previous post. I do not think that I would have to spend the extra $$ on a 1090 at this time.