NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

This morning NVIDIA has introduced the GeForce GTX 580 video card after many weeks of rumors. It has only been seven months since NVIDIA released the GeForce GTX 480 video card, but that card is officially no longer the flagship GPU of the NVIDIA arsenal. Priced at $499, the GeForce GTX 580 comes at the same suggested retail price as the GeForce GTX 480 did, but the video card has higher clock speeds and all 512 CUDA cores enabled thanks to a new GPU die revision.

Image

Article Title: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1461/1/
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
jnanster
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:09 am
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by jnanster »

Very nice review. What a great cooling system. And the thing can play Metro 2033 and 19x12! All for $500.
I agree with your price comparison regarding the HD 5970.
I own a GTX 295 and it has more problems than answers; single gpu card is the way to go.
I wonder how Intel gets so much for their CPU’s in comparison to a card like this.
It seems ridiculous that their high end chip fetches twice the price of this video card…..go figure.
ga-z77-dh3 (great & cheap O/C'er from Gigabyte)
i2600k/16 gigs Kingson 1600 (OC'ed to 4.5Ghz)
CoolerMaster Hyper 212 + (lapped, smok'in deal, 38C idle, 65C loaded)
MSI GTX 660ti Power Edition
Antec 900 case (quiet)
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by Major_A »

Bottom line: This is the card the GTX 480 was supposed to be.

Glad to see they got the thermals and power consumption in check. Great review as always.
User avatar
InspectahACE
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by InspectahACE »

Time to ditch my 480's.

Great Review Nate.
i9-9900k | ASUS Maximus XI Hero | ASUS Strix RTX 2070 Super | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB DDR4-3600 | Cooler Master ML360L AIO | Seagate Firecuda 510 1TB NVME SSD | Tt ToughPower RGB 850W PSU | Sound Blaster Z | LL PC-O11 Dynamic | ASUS Gladius II Mouse | ASUS Strix Scope RX| ASUS VG259QMM 24" 240hz monitor | Windows 11 Pro
User avatar
ckthecerealkiller
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:35 pm

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by ckthecerealkiller »

We have an update to the HAWX bench as well. 12% vs 20 some percent. Thanks for the FAST update. (Remember to refresh if you go back)

#1 site for ALL hardware reviews :supz:
sprite
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:15 pm

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by sprite »

Hi, I have a question, could you guys post benchmarks on Metro 2033 but GTX 480 vs GTX 580 with both of these cards running at the same clock, shader and memory speeds. Because I have GTX 480 in SLI from EVGA an I have an option to upgrade from my GTX 480s to GTX 580s for little money but what I'm seeing from the reviews GTX 580 is not that much faster. For example in Metro 2033 on 1920x1200 resolution GTX 580 is getting 5 more frames than GTX 480 but we have to keep in mind that GTX 580 used in the reviews has also 72 MHz more core clock, 143 MHz more shader and 98 MHz more memory. With all these settings no wonder it has ONLY 5 FRAMES more. BTW your reviews are superb. I know I'm a new user but I have been reading your reviews for a long time because you guys rock :)
gwolfman
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 662
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:57 am
Location: USA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by gwolfman »

Nate,

Thanks for the review and keeping nVidia Legit on their dual monitor setup. I'm sensing another BIOS fix. How many times do you think they'll make this same mistake? Lol.

Keep up the good work LR!
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

sprite wrote:Hi, I have a question, could you guys post benchmarks on Metro 2033 but GTX 480 vs GTX 580 with both of these cards running at the same clock, shader and memory speeds. Because I have GTX 480 in SLI from EVGA an I have an option to upgrade from my GTX 480s to GTX 580s for little money but what I'm seeing from the reviews GTX 580 is not that much faster. For example in Metro 2033 on 1920x1200 resolution GTX 580 is getting 5 more frames than GTX 480 but we have to keep in mind that GTX 580 used in the reviews has also 72 MHz more core clock, 143 MHz more shader and 98 MHz more memory. With all these settings no wonder it has ONLY 5 FRAMES more. BTW your reviews are superb. I know I'm a new user but I have been reading your reviews for a long time because you guys rock :)
Sprite,

Thanks for the support and joining the forums! I can do that for you for sure. I have the GTX 580 in the test system right now, so I will downclock it and and run the benchmarks for you. Here are the clock speeds on the two cards.
gtx480.jpg
gtx480.jpg (67.07 KiB) Viewed 10556 times
gtx580_downclocked.jpg
gtx580_downclocked.jpg (66.81 KiB) Viewed 10556 times
And the results:
metro_3.jpg
metro_3.jpg (40.54 KiB) Viewed 10484 times
Running the GeForce GTX580 and GTX480 at the same clock speeds to see what happens to performance should be interesting. This way you can see the performance boost created by just the extra CUDA cores and the new architecture enhancements on the GeForce GTX580. As you can see the clock frequency boost is where NVIDIA is getting most of their performance increase from. We are seeing a 1.33 to 1.66 FPS increase with just the extra CUDA cores, which translated to just a 3.5% boost in performance in Metro 2033 at 1920x1200. Looks like a very minor boost on this game title with the extra cores and enhancements.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Digital Puppy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4649
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 12:36 pm
Location: LA LA Land, CA
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by Digital Puppy »

Apoptosis wrote: And the results:
Hmm...interesting.

Another great review. It will be interesting to see if NV does anything (more) about the monitor situation. Good catch!
Just a little puppy trying to make it in a big digital world.
gwolfman
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 662
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:57 am
Location: USA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by gwolfman »

Apoptosis wrote:
sprite wrote:Hi, I have a question, could you guys post benchmarks on Metro 2033 but GTX 480 vs GTX 580 with both of these cards running at the same clock, shader and memory speeds. Because I have GTX 480 in SLI from EVGA an I have an option to upgrade from my GTX 480s to GTX 580s for little money but what I'm seeing from the reviews GTX 580 is not that much faster. For example in Metro 2033 on 1920x1200 resolution GTX 580 is getting 5 more frames than GTX 480 but we have to keep in mind that GTX 580 used in the reviews has also 72 MHz more core clock, 143 MHz more shader and 98 MHz more memory. With all these settings no wonder it has ONLY 5 FRAMES more. BTW your reviews are superb. I know I'm a new user but I have been reading your reviews for a long time because you guys rock :)
Sprite,

Thanks for the support and joining the forums! I can do that for you for sure. I have the GTX 580 in the test system right now, so I will downclock it and and run the benchmarks for you. Here are the clock speeds on the two cards.
gtx480.jpg
gtx580_downclocked.jpg
And the results:
results.jpg
Running the GeForce GTX580 and GTX480 at the same clock speeds to see what happens to performance should be interesting. This way you can see the performance boost created by just the extra CUDA cores and the new architecture enhancements on the GeForce GTX580. As you can see the clock frequency boost is where NVIDIA is getting most of their performance increase from. We are seeing a 1.33 to 1.66 FPS increase with just the extra CUDA cores, which translated to just a 3.5% boost in performance in Metro 2033 at 1920x1200. Looks like a very minor boost on this game title with the extra cores and enhancements.
I love this site for this exact reason (well, amongst the many). Personalized benchmarks in little time flat. What response! :prayer:
sprite
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:15 pm

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by sprite »

Thank you very much for the review. From what I see now the GTX 580 is not worth extra $80. I talked to EVGA and they have told me that I would have to send them my 2 GTX 480s and pay extra $160 to get 2 GTX 580s. You have just saved me $160 :)
INeedAFnSuffix
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:25 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by INeedAFnSuffix »

That vapor chamber thing or w/e , and i thought it will run @ 50C , nope i'm wrong .
It's still hot as ever .
Why not benchmark crysis ?
A Real Way to See if the 580 is still as hot as ever .
User avatar
InspectahACE
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by InspectahACE »

INeedAFnSuffix wrote:That vapor chamber thing or w/e , and i thought it will run @ 50C , nope i'm wrong .
It's still hot as ever .
Why not benchmark crysis ?
A Real Way to See if the 580 is still as hot as ever .
50C is a bit of an expectation for a mean card like this. I've never seen an Nvidia card run that cool other than when it's idle.

It's still a good deal cooler than the 95C(& higher) temps I've seen on the GTX 480
i9-9900k | ASUS Maximus XI Hero | ASUS Strix RTX 2070 Super | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB DDR4-3600 | Cooler Master ML360L AIO | Seagate Firecuda 510 1TB NVME SSD | Tt ToughPower RGB 850W PSU | Sound Blaster Z | LL PC-O11 Dynamic | ASUS Gladius II Mouse | ASUS Strix Scope RX| ASUS VG259QMM 24" 240hz monitor | Windows 11 Pro
User avatar
hark
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 362
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:02 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by hark »

I'm disappointed in both Nvidia and AMD. This new generation seems like a waste. It's definitely not deserving of a jump in series number. Hopefully the upcoming die shrink will bring in much better results.
User avatar
stopthekilling77
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 2188
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by stopthekilling77 »

I've put off replacing my 8800GTS 512 for quite a while now (killed my 9800GX2) and this *may* be what I pick up. I'm going to wait for AMD's next GPU release to make my final decision, but I'm definitely not wasting my money on a mid-range card again - I want something that's going to be beefy for at least another year and a half to two years. Thanks for the review!
Cyberpower generic case
B450M PRO-VDH MAX
Ryzen 5 3600 w/PBO/OC
CM Hyper 212 EVO push/pull
Corsair VENGEANCE LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16
MSI RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC LHR
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6GB Seagate HDD
EVGA 650BQ 650W PSU
ASUS VE278 27" monitor, Dell E2216HV (vertical)
Logitech Z533 2.1 Speakers, G935 7.1 or G435 headset
MS LXM-00001 keyboard
Razer Deathadder Elite, XBOX One Lunar Shift controller

I've come a long way from my original Core2Duo E6750 build y'all! :supz:
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by Apoptosis »

stopthekilling77 wrote:I've put off replacing my 8800GTS 512 for quite a while now (killed my 9800GX2) and this *may* be what I pick up. I'm going to wait for AMD's next GPU release to make my final decision, but I'm definitely not wasting my money on a mid-range card again - I want something that's going to be beefy for at least another year and a half to two years. Thanks for the review!

AMD's next GPU is the Cayman (6970/6950) and it will be out mid next month according to rumors 8-[
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
INeedAFnSuffix
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:25 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by INeedAFnSuffix »

InspectahACE wrote:
INeedAFnSuffix wrote:That vapor chamber thing or w/e , and i thought it will run @ 50C , nope i'm wrong .
It's still hot as ever .
Why not benchmark crysis ?
A Real Way to See if the 580 is still as hot as ever .
50C is a bit of an expectation for a mean card like this. I've never seen an Nvidia card run that cool other than when it's idle.

It's still a good deal cooler than the 95C(& higher) temps I've seen on the GTX 480
Yeah sure . Not even their 6150 Mobile chips .
And quite recently a failed driver blown my fans ( yes , i had to replace it ) , but it didn't wipe out my gpu and CPU , honestly .
User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by skier »

INeedAFnSuffix wrote:
InspectahACE wrote:
INeedAFnSuffix wrote:That vapor chamber thing or w/e , and i thought it will run @ 50C , nope i'm wrong .
It's still hot as ever .
Why not benchmark crysis ?
A Real Way to See if the 580 is still as hot as ever .
50C is a bit of an expectation for a mean card like this. I've never seen an Nvidia card run that cool other than when it's idle.

It's still a good deal cooler than the 95C(& higher) temps I've seen on the GTX 480
Yeah sure . Not even their 6150 Mobile chips .
And quite recently a failed driver blown my fans ( yes , i had to replace it ) , but it didn't wipe out my gpu and CPU , honestly .
so? driver problems happen, nvidia or ATI (and more commonly ATI for that matter). the hottest card ever made by NVIDIA is the 480, plain and simple. and the 580 offers marginally greater performance per clock, except 30 degrees colder with the stock heatsink, can you still honestly complain about a card with that much power loading at 70C stock? yea it's not a game changer for current upper end 400 owners unless they can't stand the heat or noise, but people that wanted a cooler and quieter card to upgrade to that didnt want 480 are happy as can be. not to mention second hand 480's will be a very logical upgrade now since everyone will be wanting the 580 for the reasons i just said (the people that have a spare hundred $ or so anyways) so what you save on the card you can put into cooling and have very similar performance

I know hypothetically if i had the money to buy a 480 when it launched or even a few months after release I wouldn't have due to its absurd temps. If I had the money today to upgrade from a lower tier card, a 580 would certainly be in my shopping cart (I wouldn't get either for a long time because a 460 1GB has me happy as can be(would possibly buy one or the other once they get below $200 though))
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
INeedAFnSuffix
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:25 am

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by INeedAFnSuffix »

skier wrote:
INeedAFnSuffix wrote:
Yeah sure . Not even their 6150 Mobile chips .
And quite recently a failed driver blown my fans ( yes , i had to replace it ) , but it didn't wipe out my gpu and CPU , honestly .
so? driver problems happen, nvidia or ATI (and more commonly ATI for that matter). the hottest card ever made by NVIDIA is the 480, plain and simple. and the 580 offers marginally greater performance per clock, except 30 degrees colder with the stock heatsink, can you still honestly complain about a card with that much power loading at 70C stock? yea it's not a game changer for current upper end 400 owners unless they can't stand the heat or noise, but people that wanted a cooler and quieter card to upgrade to that didnt want 480 are happy as can be. not to mention second hand 480's will be a very logical upgrade now since everyone will be wanting the 580 for the reasons i just said (the people that have a spare hundred $ or so anyways) so what you save on the card you can put into cooling and have very similar performance

I know hypothetically if i had the money to buy a 480 when it launched or even a few months after release I wouldn't have due to its absurd temps. If I had the money today to upgrade from a lower tier card, a 580 would certainly be in my shopping cart (I wouldn't get either for a long time because a 460 1GB has me happy as can be(would possibly buy one or the other once they get below $200 though))
Oh okay , is the 580 loud ?
User avatar
skier
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GF110 Fermi Video Card Review

Post by skier »

INeedAFnSuffix wrote: Oh okay , is the 580 loud ?
actually reading the whole article would help
the GeForce GTX 580 runs at just 47dB and the company claims that it has nearly half the noise level as the GeForce GTX 480 (53db)
-Austin
Image
Screamin' BCLK: Image
775 System (Overclocking Platform): Q8400/Q8300/E8400/E7400/E7500 - GA-EP45-UD3R v1.1 - 4GB (2x2) OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066 CL5 2.1v Corsair TX-750w
Gamer: Asrock Z77 Extreme4, i7 3770K @4.6GHz, ThermalTake Armor A90 modded, 2x4GB GSKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 CL9, Corsair HX-750w, MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr
Server2012: Q9300 - 8GB DDR2 - Asus P5QL Pro - Corsair CX430 - Mirrored 2TB Seagate's with 2TB WD cav for fileshare backups, 1TB WD for OS backups
Post Reply