Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Apoptosis »

Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Corsair has been putting out SSDs for awhile now and we have the chance to give some of their best drives a side-by-side test run to flush out any differences that may help with your purchasing decision. Featuring both Marvell and SandForce controllers, the Performance Pro and Force GT drives out up some impressive numbers but which one, if either, stand out? Read on and see.

Image
So, what have we learned from this little round up? First off, you can't go wrong with any of the drives here. All feature very fast SATA III performance and come with a standard three year warranty. The Force GT drives promise read and write specifications of up to 555MB/s reads and 525MB/s writes. This is something we observed on the ATTO benchmark where highly compressible data was used. On other benchmarks, the scores were a fair bit lower as the SandForce controllers rely on real time compression of data to optimize performance and the referenced benchmarks used already compressed data. The 240GB fared a little better than the 180GB drive as higher density NAND tends to be a little faster along with slightly different architecture.

Article Title: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1804/1/
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Sttm
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:31 pm
Location: San Jose CA

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Sttm »

The Performance Pro expected longevity is less than that of the Force GT's at 1.5M hours versus 2M hours.
Notice that the Performance Pro drive has thermal pads that rest on the NAND and there is one that rests on the controller as well. The SandForce drives lack this and frankly, I'm not sure even the Marvell drives need it.
I wonder if its because the Marvell Controller consumes more power. I noticed on the info page it lists the power consumption at 2.5w for the SF 180GB, 4.6w for the SF 240GB, and 1.4 A for the the Marvell one. If I remember my schooling correctly, watts = amps x volts. Corsair lists its voltage as 5v. So then its 5V x 1.4A = 7 Watts, so it consumes 65% more power then the 240GB drive. Not a significant amount in the overall system but interesting if its just a difference in the controller that causes that energy increase.
Core i7 2600k/ ASUS P8Z68-V Z68/ 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 Blue/ EVGA Geforce GTX 560ti Maximum Graphics Edition/Windows 7/Antec 300/Antec 650w/LG Blu Combo/Hp 27inch 2710M/Samsung P2770HD

"I think sharing is overrated...and helping others. And what's all this crap I've been hearing about tolerance?"
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Major_A »

If I were walking by a rack of these and saw the names on the box I'd immediately think the Performance Pro was the faster drive. Then I would be mistaken.
Sttm
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:31 pm
Location: San Jose CA

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Sttm »

Major_A wrote:If I were walking by a rack of these and saw the names on the box I'd immediately think the Performance Pro was the faster drive. Then I would be mistaken.
Guess they need to put a racing stripe on the Force GT then!
Core i7 2600k/ ASUS P8Z68-V Z68/ 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 Blue/ EVGA Geforce GTX 560ti Maximum Graphics Edition/Windows 7/Antec 300/Antec 650w/LG Blu Combo/Hp 27inch 2710M/Samsung P2770HD

"I think sharing is overrated...and helping others. And what's all this crap I've been hearing about tolerance?"
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Major_A »

Or name it xForce GT. Because we all know that if something starts with an X it is the baddest, hippest product available.
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Apoptosis »

Here is the Corsair Performance Pro 256GB SSD in the ASUS K53E Notebook as the primary drive:
drive.png
drive.png (77.83 KiB) Viewed 3947 times
drive2.png
drive2.png (52.55 KiB) Viewed 3947 times
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Major_A »

Why the speed difference between the laptop and the desktop review? Different board chipsets?
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Corsair Force GT & Performance Pro SATA III SSD Roundup

Post by Apoptosis »

Major_A wrote:Why the speed difference between the laptop and the desktop review? Different board chipsets?
Different everything... In the laptop it was used as the primary drive with a slower CPU and different chipset, drivers and so on.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Post Reply