Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33921
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by Apoptosis » Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:54 pm

Earlier this month Seagate announced their new ‘Guardian Series’ of Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and that the BarraCuda name was being revived! Seagate brought back the BarraCuda name in grand fashion as there is a BarraCuda Pro 10TB drive and that makes it the world’s highest capacity consumer HDD. What a better way than to come back after being away for nearly three years and being the largest capacity drive in the World!

Image


Article Title: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/seagate-bar ... iew_184738
Pricing At Time of Print: $508.99 shipped from Amazon
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!

User avatar
sbohdan
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1266
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by sbohdan » Sat Jul 30, 2016 2:10 am

I would be mostly interested not in capacity but how secure is the data on it! The bigger the drive is, the more data can be lost, so I want to know how sturdy, durable the drive is. I lost too much data before because of high capacity but garbage quality HDD's! I would like to see reliable durability tests from the manufacturers and WAY better quality control!
Main rig: NZXT Phantom modded case with Danger Den WC, MSI Tomahawk B350, Ryzen 1700X @ 3.4Ghz, 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200Mhz 16-18-18-36, MSI GTX 1060 3GT OC, Asus 24" 1ms 144hz, Intel P7600 256Gb nvme PCiE, Samsung 2TB; PC P&C 750W, Win10 Pro 64
Laptop: Dell XPS 1530 (T9500; 4GB 800 RAM; 120GB Crucial SSD; 8600GT; WIN7 64bit)
my complete GFX tuneup & cooling mod: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopi ... highlight=

User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by KnightRid » Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:58 pm

I agree. They could send me 5 of them to put in my Synology 1512+ NAS for a long term test :mrgreen:

10TB is a lot to lose at once but it would be perfect for NAS applications if they are durable enough for long term. I could actually fit my blu ray and dvd collection all on them!
Cigar Blog I review for - http://www.stogiereview.com

Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me :finga:

User avatar
DJ Tucker
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Hardbase Headquaters
Contact:

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by DJ Tucker » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:30 am

I've had hdd problems in the past and agree with you guys. it's it durable enough to last as backing up this drive would mean you would need 2 of them to be safe and that's a lot of time and money wasted if they fail just as the old hdd did.
Armageddon V1.0
Processor: Core i7 9700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.232v Barrow 360 Loop
Memory: 16Gb Corsair Vengeance LED 2700Mhz CL16
Hard Drive: Silicon Power P32A80 128Gb & Intel 660p 2Tb
Video Card: Gigabyte RTX 2070 Heatkiller IV Block 1995Mhz @ 0.950v
Power Supply: Corsair HX1000i
Monitor: Samsung 1080p C27F396
Operating System: Windows 10 64 bit Pro
Mobo: ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Case: Vector VDM01
Peripherals: Corsair K70 Lux, M65 Pro, MSI GC30 and Void Pro Wireless

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33921
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by Apoptosis » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:32 am

You wouldn't want to use this drive in a NAS as it's not rated for 24/7 use. The Seagate FireCuda 10TB NAS drive is rated for 24 hours of use and costs less - $448.99.

The best failure data is given by BackBlaze - https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-dri ... s-q1-2016/

Image
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!

User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by bubba » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:37 am

They have a long way to go to get my trust back. One too many failed drives. They might be getting better, but I don't know.

Aside from trust issues, doubt I would use a drive that large.. maybe after they mature a bit. For now I will stick with a large RAID in my NAS.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
-Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33921
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by Apoptosis » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:40 am

bubba wrote:They have a long way to go to get my trust back. One too many failed drives. They might be getting better, but I don't know.
I think most hard drive companies got a bad reputation when many were putting the lowest priced 'green' hard drives in a NAS and were killing them. Now with specialized firmware for each niche the failure rates are getting better. The BackBlaze numbers for Seagate have gotten dramatically better in the past year and they actually have a lower failure rate than WD.
Find us on Facebook to discover the faces behind the names!
Follow Me on Twitter!

User avatar
KnightRid
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:21 am
Location: Dallastown, PA

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by KnightRid » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:01 pm

So far I have never had one of my Western Digital Red 3TB drives fail in the NAS (knock on wood). Kind of surprising when I see that chart and a bit concerning too :|
Cigar Blog I review for - http://www.stogiereview.com

Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me :finga:

User avatar
DJ Tucker
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Hardbase Headquaters
Contact:

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by DJ Tucker » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:51 am

That's quite a high fail rate but that's based on quite a few drives. I have a Seagate barracuda in my partners system that is 9 years old and still going strong. It was 90mbps read and 80mbps write when new. It's now 60mbps read and 60mbps write and the 4k read and write are the same as it was when I brought the drive (0.6mbps). it has a total of 10000+ power on hours. Doing me proud :)
Armageddon V1.0
Processor: Core i7 9700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.232v Barrow 360 Loop
Memory: 16Gb Corsair Vengeance LED 2700Mhz CL16
Hard Drive: Silicon Power P32A80 128Gb & Intel 660p 2Tb
Video Card: Gigabyte RTX 2070 Heatkiller IV Block 1995Mhz @ 0.950v
Power Supply: Corsair HX1000i
Monitor: Samsung 1080p C27F396
Operating System: Windows 10 64 bit Pro
Mobo: ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Case: Vector VDM01
Peripherals: Corsair K70 Lux, M65 Pro, MSI GC30 and Void Pro Wireless

User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Re: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 10TB HDD Review

Post by bubba » Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:34 am

Apoptosis wrote:
bubba wrote:They have a long way to go to get my trust back. One too many failed drives. They might be getting better, but I don't know.
I think most hard drive companies got a bad reputation when many were putting the lowest priced 'green' hard drives in a NAS and were killing them. Now with specialized firmware for each niche the failure rates are getting better. The BackBlaze numbers for Seagate have gotten dramatically better in the past year and they actually have a lower failure rate than WD.
I wasn't using them in RAIDs, they non-green cuda drives and were in run of the mill desktops. Some come in off the shelf systems, some I built. After about 60 failed drives in a year or so span I gave up on them. I know a lot of people that are running their drives now, I just still have the bad feelings about them.

I did run into issues with WD Greens in NAS systems. The S.M.A.R.T. stuff on the drives always caused errors in the RAID, replaced them with BLACK series drives. Wasn't long after that the RED drives showed up. I run the RED drives in NAS systems for data, Purple drives on the one surveillance setup I have (part of a NAS).

Even then, 10TB drives... thats A LOT of data. 6 drive RAID6 is 37ishTB of formatted space with 2 drive fault buffer...
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
-Thomas Jefferson

Post Reply