Yonah Benchmarks

Kerii · Post by **Kerii** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:41 am

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... i=2627&p=1

Neat little preview, unfortunately, it seems we've got yet another new socket on our hands.

infinitevalence · Post by **infinitevalence** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:25 am

The thing that pisses me off is that they did not compair single core donthan power consumption to yonah. I want to know how much more power it uses!

gvblake22 · Post by **gvblake22** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:55 am

infinitevalence wrote:The thing that pisses me off is that they did not compair single core donthan power consumption to yonah. I want to know how much more power it uses!

YEAH! I totally agree. I got to the end of the article and was like, "WTF?! Where's the Dothan?!"
ya win some, ya lose some I guess

infinitevalence · Post by **infinitevalence** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:57 am

or maybe intel wont let them show the difference because it would show how much better the donthan is in low voltage situations.

-mogwai · Post by **-mogwai** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:06 pm

what a disappointment. i thought it's be better than it is.

Turtle 1 · Post by **Turtle 1** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:50 pm

Why are you disappointed ?

What was the memory speed set at ?
What was the memory timings set at ?
What M/B was used . It had no O/C functions.
AT was suppose to do a follow up but thats still coming.

I was very impressed considering the available information .

I can't remember the article but I believe it was ECS. is going to release a M/B with the Intel 975x chipset with a yonah socket. I will wait for more reviews befor I past jugdement. It is all so important to remember that Dothans scale very well the higher the FSB is raised. I think Intel has a winner here . We shall see very shortly.
Did you exspect yonah to kill AMD 64 ? I didn't but I think Yonah will win 80% of the benchies once we get M/B's that support it.

If yonah O/C's to 3.0 GHz easily I would say its a very good CPU. Conroe should be a monster