htpc?
personal preference. HTPC relies more on the capture device, since you do not want one that doesnt process the MPG on card. hauppauge cards do, dunno about the others. I know ATI AIW cards DO NOT.
You can run a HTPC on minimal processor speed with a good capture card. Spend more money on hard drives - TONS of space needed! and memory.
Mike
Oh AMD RULES :p
You can run a HTPC on minimal processor speed with a good capture card. Spend more money on hard drives - TONS of space needed! and memory.
Mike
Oh AMD RULES :p
Remember, I am opinionated and nothing I say or do reflects on anyone or anything else but me 

- infinitevalence
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:40 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
- kenc51
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Contact:
I think so.....But Infinite is right, Intel are hotter chips and do require more cooling, but in most cases your not going to overclock, so you can actually lower the default voltage to lower temps.SAMSAMHA wrote:the new intel 805 seems to have a lot of potential. what do you think? it's cheaper than x2 but it got a good performance as well. would it be a good choice as well?
Also the lower end chips don't use too much power so cooling/noise shouldn't be an issue.
It depends on your case too....if you get a case to fit the Zalman HSF then you can have a very quiet system without paying that extra premium that AMD charges for their dual cores....(but AMD is the better chip, just costs too much)