TurboCache is a driver technology that enables lower-end nVidia cards to access the main memory of a PCI-E based system as if it were local memory to the card (so nV's marketing department says, but you get the idea. Shared memory. Boo.)
However, can you reverse the process and allow applications to use the GDDR3 on a high-end videocard instead of going into the slower system RAM? I was using 3ds max today, and it was eating about 510MB of RAM and on top of that 510MB for virtual memory as well. I just thought "If 3ds max could use my second 7900GTX as RAM (with SLI off of course), then this wouldn't happen and everything wouldn't lag so bad..."
Thoughts? Is it ingenious or idiocy?
Reverse TurboCache?
Reverse TurboCache?
Play
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz :: 8GB DDR2-800 :: eVGA 9800GX2 :: 7900GTX (secondary) :: abit IP35 Pro :: 150GB Raptor 10k RPM :: 2x750GB WD Caviar :: 120GB WD :: X-Fi XtremeMusic :: NEC 4551A :: BenQ DVD Combodrive (52x32x52) :: Dual 22" Acer AL2216W :: Thermaltake Armor Black :: Logitech Z5500 5.1
Work
Core 2 Duo @ 2.53GHz :: 4GB DDR3 @ 1067MHz :: 3670 :: Intel PM45 Chipset :: 500GB 5400RPM SATA :: Integrated Audio :: BD-ROM/DVD Burner :: 16" 1920x1080 RGBLED
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz :: 8GB DDR2-800 :: eVGA 9800GX2 :: 7900GTX (secondary) :: abit IP35 Pro :: 150GB Raptor 10k RPM :: 2x750GB WD Caviar :: 120GB WD :: X-Fi XtremeMusic :: NEC 4551A :: BenQ DVD Combodrive (52x32x52) :: Dual 22" Acer AL2216W :: Thermaltake Armor Black :: Logitech Z5500 5.1
Work
Core 2 Duo @ 2.53GHz :: 4GB DDR3 @ 1067MHz :: 3670 :: Intel PM45 Chipset :: 500GB 5400RPM SATA :: Integrated Audio :: BD-ROM/DVD Burner :: 16" 1920x1080 RGBLED