What happened with Intel will/should happen with nVidia and ATI. I say we will hit a peak of 1500W before we go back down to like 700-800W....They just have to lower the power usage of these parts..
~Ibrahim~
How much power supply will i need in 2007?
- stev
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:29 am
- Location: Nashville, TN suburbs
- Contact:
I'm currently at a 550W PSU. I find this to be a minimum at best since I also do liquid cooling.
850W may hold a few people over for a period of a few more years. I remember when people thought 330W was a high ended PSU for power over the 75W, 150W and 240W PSUs of long ago.
Going higher will make the electric meter buzz a little faster. However, the newer LCD flat screens require less power over the CRT types. So, there could be a balance of power usage there.
If making a gaming machine with high priced graphics cards and high priced PSU's, people might switch to XBOX's, PS2/3 or something else do to overall cost.
850W may hold a few people over for a period of a few more years. I remember when people thought 330W was a high ended PSU for power over the 75W, 150W and 240W PSUs of long ago.
Going higher will make the electric meter buzz a little faster. However, the newer LCD flat screens require less power over the CRT types. So, there could be a balance of power usage there.
If making a gaming machine with high priced graphics cards and high priced PSU's, people might switch to XBOX's, PS2/3 or something else do to overall cost.

AMD X2 TK-57 1.90Ghz | F700 Quanta | PC2-5300 DDR2 2Gb | GeForce 7000M | DVDRAM GSA-T40N | HP LaserJet 1018
My Stats http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=303718
http://www.eff.org - Electronic Frontier Foundation - working to protect your digital rights
My Stats http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=303718
http://www.eff.org - Electronic Frontier Foundation - working to protect your digital rights
I disagree with all of you!!! Power consumption must fall!!
Regards,Just as Intel's Core Duo consumes 40% less power than its nearest ancestor, so also must the latest "state of the art" gaming systems by end of '07. The latest NVidia and ATI graphics powerhouses are dinosaurs already, and will soon be replaced with much more power conserving solutions. Hell, the G80 took 4+ years to design (from Anandtech,Architecting such a massive GPU has taken NVIDIA a great deal of time and money, four years and $475M to be exact.), and there is no doubt that its power friendly replacement is quickly reaching design completion and will meet the mainstream marketplace by end of '07. Consider that with the INTEL/ATI partnership, that NVidia only has a few months of performance reign before they will be BLOWN out of the water again by an ATI product (just as with the X1900) that will use much, much less power than the gigantic G80 design.
jtleon
Iwill DH800 - Xeon SL74T LVs @ 3.5Ghz - Mushkin 2Gb ES @ FSB233 - Gainward 7800GS+ 512Mb
AMS 460W XPS - 100% 3D Stable to 85°F (30°C) Ambient
AMS 460W XPS - 100% 3D Stable to 85°F (30°C) Ambient
- Illuminati
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:48 am
- Location: Wright City, Missouri, USA
- Contact:
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
I agree with that too, The chips before the c2d (pentium D) were power hoggs and could be used as an oven If i remember what i read correctly. Then came the pentD EE which used less power at the same speed? and now the low power low heat c2d's that can be cranked up to speeds that should be able to find super pi to 32m in 15 seconds lol.
anyways so why not the GPU market next? I think that they will streamline the processors to run faster cooler and at lower power levels.
Maybe the new generation of video cards will make the current quad sli technology look like a geforce 2 gts does now.
anyways so why not the GPU market next? I think that they will streamline the processors to run faster cooler and at lower power levels.
Maybe the new generation of video cards will make the current quad sli technology look like a geforce 2 gts does now.
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- dicecca112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:40 am
- Contact:
Haha you have no idea. the 8X0 series was a joke, I ran at load in the upper seventies. the 9x0 series i ran in the upper 60s. All on air mind you. I'm looking at AMDs and going wtf they are running at 30-40s and kicking my butt. I was happy C2D came out. Hey I fold, so there is no such thing as idle temps for mezparker wrote:I agree with that too, The chips before the c2d (pentium D) were power hoggs and could be used as an oven If i remember what i read correctly. Then came the pentD EE which used less power at the same speed? and now the low power low heat c2d's that can be cranked up to speeds that should be able to find super pi to 32m in 15 seconds lol.
anyways so why not the GPU market next? I think that they will streamline the processors to run faster cooler and at lower power levels.
Maybe the new generation of video cards will make the current quad sli technology look like a geforce 2 gts does now.

- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
damn you coulda started a bakery and wrote it off as a business deduction on your taxes as part of the baking equipment...I ran at load in the upper seventies

EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet