Super Pi
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Super Pi
I have run super pi with the system at 3ghz per core 1.31v and 4-4-4-12 2t at 2.1v
It took me 19m 39s to find pi to 32m places.
Is that good? What are some of yalls times.
It took me 19m 39s to find pi to 32m places.
Is that good? What are some of yalls times.
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- kenc51
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Contact:
I get SuperPi 32m - 29min 47sec 50ms with the rig in my sig!
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565852
Also check out this thread, http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopic.php?t=7486
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565852
Also check out this thread, http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopic.php?t=7486
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
i also had prime 95 running on the second core using 1024mb of ram.
I will run it by its self tonight and update.
I will run it by its self tonight and update.
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- kenc51
- Legit Extremist
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Contact:
I didn't try tweak anything really.......Your ~250MHz faster but ~4mins difference doesn't sound right to meFZ1 wrote:That's a good score zparker. I got 26M Ken![]()
![]()
![]()
Tighter memory timings and faster RAM really help this benchmark.

Doesn't bother me too much......Conroe is on the horizon anyway

- dicecca112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:40 am
- Contact:
well I have tighter timings and a faster clock on my E6400 and I was about a little under 17mins so that seems about right.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566226
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566226

- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
yeah i understand, I had a amd athlon xp barton core 2800+ with a gig of dual channel 9800 pro 128 flashed to xt 128 and could only get 15k on 3dmark 01se. It didnt make sense to me. But now i saved a little money and went current middle of the market and am happy beone belief. Espically since they overclock so well. If you look at it like I do, I went from a 2.1 gig system to a 6 gig monster
It makes me feel all warm inside 


EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
ok Ran it with nothing else running. set afftinity to core 2 and got pi in 18m 04s to 32m with everything still at the same settings as before just it being the only thing running. Next i will set at 3.2 and run it again and post those results.
edit got the results... processors at 3.2 voltage a 1.325v memory at 4-4-4-12 2t 2.1v
super pi in 16m 42s to 32m
core temps didnt break 54c stock cooling!
Hows that???
edit got the results... processors at 3.2 voltage a 1.325v memory at 4-4-4-12 2t 2.1v
super pi in 16m 42s to 32m
core temps didnt break 54c stock cooling!
Hows that???
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
well im happy as pie since i am a 1st time overclocker.
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
- zparker
- Legit Fanatic
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:28 pm
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
yeah that is why i stopped with 3.0ghz. It runs smooth and is stable without a shitload of tweaking. I still have no complaints.
EVGA nForce 680i SLI board, XFX GeForce 7950GT@641/1244, Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 800 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) 2.1v, Core 2 Duo E6400 (3.0ghz) at 56c max stock cooling, 2 Seagate Barracuda sata 3.0gb 320gb not raid yet and 550watts
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet
old board at 3.2 stock videocard settings / new board at 3.0 oc video card / 3.2 & oc video card
3dmark 2003 score= 22851 / 25262 / 25767
3dmark 2005 score= 10220 / 11764 / not yet