Vista Memory Usage

Operating Systems
Windows, Linux, Solaris, Red Hat, etc.....32 bit or 64 bit.
If its an OS, its here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Illuminati
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2378
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:48 am
Location: Wright City, Missouri, USA
Contact:

Vista Memory Usage

Post by Illuminati »

The company I work for has one Dell running vista... its a 3.4GHz Pentium D Processor with 2 Gb of memory and on board video (so Aero was not running). There were a few 'Vista Gadgets' running on the gadget bar, like CPU and Memory usage dials, RSS reader, Clock, picture slide show. IE7 was open to an internal webpage and minimized in the task bar.

When I opened up Task Manager to view the actual memory usage, I was not shocked by any means... it was right around where I expected.

It said:
590 MB In Use

Just wanted to share my first Vista experience! :yikes:
Justin West
Server Admin & Forum Moderator
Follow me on Twitter | Find us on Facebook
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis »

sounds about right... what was the rating on the system and was this an RC version of full?
User avatar
ikjadoon
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:17 am

Post by ikjadoon »

How much more can one expect with Aero Glass on?

~Ibrahim~
Overdrive PC Core2.SLI:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ ~3.5GHz, ASUS P5N-E SLI, 4GB of DDR2-770, 8800GTS 640MB @ 621/1836, Western Digital 640GB, LITE-ON 20X, CM Stacker 830, Enermax 620W, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

3DMark '06: 10,302
SuperPI 1M: 15.194s
WEI: 5.7
User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Post by bubba »

Thats 78 more megs of RAM than I have in my system at the moment LOL

No Vista for me, aleast till I build the next machine.
Last edited by bubba on Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dgood
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1190
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Mukilteo, WA

Post by dgood »

how much does your system memory usage relate to poor fps in games?
Image
User avatar
ikjadoon
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:17 am

Post by ikjadoon »

bubba wrote:Thats 72 more megs of RAM than I have in my system at the moment LOL

No Vista for me, aleast till I build the next machine.
Don't you mean 78 more? lol, jk!

Yeah, I've been wondering that. Could the lower FPS in games be attributed to Aero Glass?

~Ibrahim~
Overdrive PC Core2.SLI:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ ~3.5GHz, ASUS P5N-E SLI, 4GB of DDR2-770, 8800GTS 640MB @ 621/1836, Western Digital 640GB, LITE-ON 20X, CM Stacker 830, Enermax 620W, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

3DMark '06: 10,302
SuperPI 1M: 15.194s
WEI: 5.7
User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Post by bubba »

DOH! was in a hurry, but you know what I ment :lol: I fixed it.
User avatar
Illuminati
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2378
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:48 am
Location: Wright City, Missouri, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminati »

Apoptosis wrote:sounds about right... what was the rating on the system and was this an RC version of full?
Not sure... I think they got this copy from Dell, so I imagine it is full version of Business Premium... don't know the rating either.
Justin West
Server Admin & Forum Moderator
Follow me on Twitter | Find us on Facebook
cyberneticimplant
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:00 pm

Post by cyberneticimplant »

St. John, who led Microsoft's efforts to ensure that older games were compatible with Windows 95, said the root of the problem is in Vista's heightened security features. Simply put, the software doesn't seem to differentiate between noxious "malware" and innocent games. The software's parental control feature, for example, screens out family-friendly games that aren't rated, he said, adding that getting a grade from the Entertainment Software Rating Board is a hefty expense for smaller developers.
I'll be switching to Linux soon.
Sovereign
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 5:28 pm

Post by Sovereign »

From what I heard, that's a "feature..." ROFL. I think Vista's SuperFetch loads a bunch of things it thinks you might need, so when you actually go to load the relevant program it runs faster. However, a side effect is higher memory usage. Once I get Ultimate for my desktop (aka once SLI is supported for 7900s) then I'll see how much of my 2GB it sucks down, and what it does to games.
Play
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz :: 8GB DDR2-800 :: eVGA 9800GX2 :: 7900GTX (secondary) :: abit IP35 Pro :: 150GB Raptor 10k RPM :: 2x750GB WD Caviar :: 120GB WD :: X-Fi XtremeMusic :: NEC 4551A :: BenQ DVD Combodrive (52x32x52) :: Dual 22" Acer AL2216W :: Thermaltake Armor Black :: Logitech Z5500 5.1

Work
Core 2 Duo @ 2.53GHz :: 4GB DDR3 @ 1067MHz :: 3670 :: Intel PM45 Chipset :: 500GB 5400RPM SATA :: Integrated Audio :: BD-ROM/DVD Burner :: 16" 1920x1080 RGBLED
User avatar
ikjadoon
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:17 am

Post by ikjadoon »

THG has an article on SuperFetch and ReadyBoost.

~Ibrahim~
Overdrive PC Core2.SLI:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ ~3.5GHz, ASUS P5N-E SLI, 4GB of DDR2-770, 8800GTS 640MB @ 621/1836, Western Digital 640GB, LITE-ON 20X, CM Stacker 830, Enermax 620W, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

3DMark '06: 10,302
SuperPI 1M: 15.194s
WEI: 5.7
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis »

I just did the upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Ultimate and the system is using 664MB with just the task manager and IE7 open...
User avatar
Cypher
Legit Fanatic
Legit Fanatic
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 5:21 am
Location: St. Charles, MO
Contact:

Post by Cypher »

I installed Vista Ultimate on my laptop, and after a few hours of playing around with it, I'm currently reinstalling XP x64 back on to it.

Vista just has way too much bloat for me, the navigation around the OS itself is horrid. When I set the machine to use the Windows Classic Skin/Theme, it should get all of the navigation aspects of it to Windows Classic as well. BitLocker is a joke, I just think the majority of all the "extras" is useless.

Their was however very little speed difference going from XP x64 to Ultimate x64 on a 1.6Ghz Turion64 X2 with 1GB of RAM.

Their's already been reports of the first Remote Exploit of Vista, and already a handful of security releases have already been out. They're already planning and starting to work on Service Pack 1. Maybe after service pack 1, or even 2 comes out I'll give Vista another try, until then I'm sticking with my 64bit XP.
Facebook | Linux Systems Administrator | Web and Software Developer | Microsoft Certified Professional

"Wielding power untouched by mortal man."
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis »

Cypher wrote:I installed Vista Ultimate on my laptop, and after a few hours of playing around with it, I'm currently reinstalling XP x64 back on to it.

Vista just has way too much bloat for me, the navigation around the OS itself is horrid. When I set the machine to use the Windows Classic Skin/Theme, it should get all of the navigation aspects of it to Windows Classic as well. BitLocker is a joke, I just think the majority of all the "extras" is useless.

Their was however very little speed difference going from XP x64 to Ultimate x64 on a 1.6Ghz Turion64 X2 with 1GB of RAM.

Their's already been reports of the first Remote Exploit of Vista, and already a handful of security releases have already been out. They're already planning and starting to work on Service Pack 1. Maybe after service pack 1, or even 2 comes out I'll give Vista another try, until then I'm sticking with my 64bit XP.
The navigation around the OS is not that much different from XP... I really like the new search. I have over 20,000 pictures that I have taken for Legit Reviews and the new search cuts down the time looking for files and images drastically. I also like the new look and feel... Hell I've been using XP Pro since 2001, so this is a nice change. For this PC i do my multimedia stuff and for that this OS is ideal, so I'm happy with it. I just got rid of my upgrade and installed Vista Ultimate on two brand new Raptor X drives that I bought from Newegg with the rebate and am very happy with this install... I didn't think I'd notice, but RAID 0 seems to make some tasks faster..

Right now I'm posting this and listening to their sample music directory and am using 716MB of memory...

In the end it all depends on what your doing... I have Readyboost USB drives and they are pretty damn sweet too now that I can use them. I also love the sidebar... I've added Google Search and Weather found one online that can do my dual-core CPU and also monitor the memory. I also have custom slideshows and the RSS feeds I like all on my desktop. It's tight so far.
User avatar
dgood
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1190
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Mukilteo, WA

Post by dgood »

sounds like a fun time for me who likes to just mess around with the os and surf a lot in between gaming so I bet i'd like vista too bad we can't just a get a forum 'site liscense' and make legal copies of it lol.
Image
User avatar
ikjadoon
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:17 am

Post by ikjadoon »

Apoptosis wrote:I just did the upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Ultimate and the system is using 664MB with just the task manager and IE7 open...
Damnation...I hope 2GB will be enough!

~Ibrahim~
Overdrive PC Core2.SLI:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ ~3.5GHz, ASUS P5N-E SLI, 4GB of DDR2-770, 8800GTS 640MB @ 621/1836, Western Digital 640GB, LITE-ON 20X, CM Stacker 830, Enermax 620W, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

3DMark '06: 10,302
SuperPI 1M: 15.194s
WEI: 5.7
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Post by Apoptosis »

seems to be... I'm going to write up a quick how to install vista article that is mostly pictures and no text as it's that simple and after I get that knocked out I might do some memory performance using 3dmark06 as my benchmark... use 512/1GB/2GB/4GB to show difference and throw in my readyboost USB key for shits and grins.
User avatar
ikjadoon
Legit Aficionado
Legit Aficionado
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:17 am

Post by ikjadoon »

Apoptosis wrote:seems to be... I'm going to write up a quick how to install vista article that is mostly pictures and no text as it's that simple and after I get that knocked out I might do some memory performance using 3dmark06 as my benchmark... use 512/1GB/2GB/4GB to show difference and throw in my readyboost USB key for shits and grins.
That'd be nice! Thanks!

~Ibrahim~
Overdrive PC Core2.SLI:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ ~3.5GHz, ASUS P5N-E SLI, 4GB of DDR2-770, 8800GTS 640MB @ 621/1836, Western Digital 640GB, LITE-ON 20X, CM Stacker 830, Enermax 620W, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

3DMark '06: 10,302
SuperPI 1M: 15.194s
WEI: 5.7
User avatar
stev
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:29 am
Location: Nashville, TN suburbs
Contact:

Post by stev »

Apoptosis wrote:I just did the upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Ultimate and the system is using 664MB with just the task manager and IE7 open...


Are you sure it wasn't 666Mb ... :snakeman:
AMD X2 TK-57 1.90Ghz | F700 Quanta | PC2-5300 DDR2 2Gb | GeForce 7000M | DVDRAM GSA-T40N | HP LaserJet 1018
My Stats http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=303718
Image
http://www.eff.org - Electronic Frontier Foundation - working to protect your digital rights
rocktrout
Legit Enthusiast
Legit Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:48 am

Post by rocktrout »

I've been running Vista Ultimate on my laptop for about a month. The machine has 2gigs of ram and shows 656megs ran with Eudora and IE7 open. Not a bad OS, the UAC can be a major PIA.
Post Reply